Archive
Archives

Wikipedia's Expert Peer Review process (or lack of such) for Science related articles edit

Hi - I posted the section with the same name on my talk page. Could you take part in discussion ? Thanks ARP Apovolot (talk) 21:38, 25 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


What's your problem 2? edit

Hi Lambian,

regarding the Alan Greenspan wikipedia entry, I wonder what could be you problem with the religion tag I added?? Why would you deny that americans of jewish denomination can achieve great positions and contribute to society??
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.143.190.162 (talkcontribs) 22:44, November 9, 2008 (UTC)


Warnings edit


November 2008 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please take care of your actions in Persecution of Muslims article. please read wikipedia policies and guidelines and do not BLANK well referenced material.

--Polysynaptic (talk) 14:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Someone needs to read WP:DTTR. --Adoniscik(t, c) 02:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Ergenekon (organization) edit

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Adoniscik(t, c) 20:11, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Line article edit

Hi Lambiam. Can I prevail on you to take a position on the question I raised just now concerning the second sentence of the article on lines at the bottom of that article's talk page? If you agree with Tango I won't argue the point further. --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 06:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your recent editing at Apostrophe edit

Lambiam, great to see you in action at Apostrophe. Apt examples; but there are some concerns. Please have a look at this in the talkpage.

Best wishes to you.–¡ɐɔıʇǝoNoetica!T– 20:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Spam in Kampyle edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kampyle, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kampyle is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kampyle, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

You guys edit

Gandalf61 and Algebraist and Lambiam and KSmrq and Meni Rosenfeld and others have taught me more about mathematics than have all of my formal instructors - THANKS. hydnjo talk 02:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science edit

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Gazimoff 01:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply