Your recent edit to Lambda Chi Alpha was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 15:17, 5 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

It did reverse a legitimate edit. I have established more functional and readable sub-sections of notable Lambda Chi Alpha members. They were previously set up by various "award" designations {e.g., Lambda Chi Alpha members who received a Golden Globe award, etc.). I have divided them up more reasonably by their career and primary notability. It seems to be a vast improvement. LambdaChi 01:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Zeta?

edit

I'm assuming you're a Lambda Chi, of course (something about the username), but where're you from? I'm from Θ-Κ Zeta, at Rose-Hulman.

Hey this is Wakefencer, Theta Tau 1019 at Wake Forest University, Great to know you!--Wakefencer 04:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Userbox

edit

There is an Lambda Chi Alpha userbox {{User Lambda Chi Alpha}} that you could use on your page. Rasamassen (talk) 18:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

NNDB

edit

I've noticed that you've been adding a lot of links to NNDB biographies of various people. While I'll admit that the site is interesting, it doesn't seem to me that these biographies provide any useful information or meet Wikipedia's external links policy. The notability and reliability of NNDB also concerns me. The other issue is that NNDB has bios for thousands of people, almost all of whom have Wikipedia pages. Would you have us link to NNDB on all of them? As such, I'm undoing your additions. Oren0 (talk) 08:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply