Sources for Improvement or Solidification for Deletion edit

The Puerto Rican population is not a significant immigrant population to Germany. The purpose of this article seems unclear. There are no links associated with the information related to the Stuttgart populations etc. In the vein of the larger WikiProject Germany pursuits, this article should be deleted. The topic does not put forth any information apart from simple population centers. Photographs and other evidence could be valuable in showing an importance of this cultural community for the people of Germany. Perhaps how the Carnival customs of the Puerto Ricans are represented during Fasching. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Puerto_Ricans_in_Germany&action=edit&redlink=1 KuNsT716 (talk) 22:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

So since our last communication, I have a follow-up question: why do you think this page was deleted? Aolivex (talk) 14:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Simply because of the lack of substantial evidence to solidify why it exists as a notable topic for an encyclopedic website? KuNsT716 (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Probably. Some subjects aren't "notable" enough to deserve their own articles. This isn't always bad. Sometimes it's better to have the article folded into a broader, related topic.


Project topic edit

(1) Gerhard Richter

KuNsT716 (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

These are some great topics, but remember, our class focusses on the post-1945 period. Would you be able to orient your research more directly to the course material, perhaps by focussing on the legacy or impact of some of these movements? Let me know if you have questions - would love to discuss! Aolivex (talk) 19:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Could you add this Article to our class list on the Course Page? Aolivex (talk) 17:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply