KramerCosmo
Regarding your edit to Michael Richards: edit
Your recent edit to Michael Richards (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user editing a page that experiences malicious edits by banned users that continue to edit via shared IP ranges or open proxies. Since these ranges are too large (collateral damage) to be blocked and user's IP addresses are not visible, edits to this page by logged-out editors of server or shared IP ranges and new users are reverted. The changes can be reviewed and restored by established users. // VoABot II 23:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
KramerCosmo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
how am i sockpuppet because i have that wikipedia biography infobox in my profile? aren't there hundreds of other users that have the userbox? why dont you also block the user whose page i copied the biography infobox from? i saw another edit on the michael richards article his user page had that infobox biography on his user page so i added to my own user page because michael richards is part of the biography project -- i didnt know i had to add my name to some list, how does this make me a sockpuppet? first you said one name then you changed it to some other account name, neither of which i am associated with or have heard of before why am i being accused of this nonsense?
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
KramerCosmo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
how can checkuser establish any identity when i am obviously not this person? i dont know what methods it uses but it must do a bit of extrapolating for it to assume that, are you sure you dont just fake results to get me banned? this is all because i was reverting netscott for making large page changes without consensus, and now your banning me because im trying to enforce rules that i read, what happened to WP:Bold and WP:3RR? i was being bold trying to enforce the 3rr on netscott and now i am being blocked for it i dont understand what this is really about
Decline reason:
You are a sockpuppet. Please find something better to do. —Pilotguy (radio check) 14:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sorry edit
I'm sorry to see that you were blocked. It's probably not for me to speculate regarding the circumstances surrounding your initial blocking. I don't have the facts. From what I can see, however, you disagreed with the wrong person and that editor tried to "trump up" an argument based on some unrelated incident regarding uploading pictures to get you blocked. I, for one, want to go on record as saying that I NEVER saw you do ANYTHING contrary to policy. All you ever did was disagree with a certain editor who apparently "has it out for you". I think there could be a problem on Wikipedia with arbitrary "infinite blocks" of people. Regardless, I wanted to let you know that your inputs WERE valuable, and that you are missed by more objective editors like myself. Best Regards, Cleo123 10:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)