Notability of Michael Kozlov

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Michael Kozlov, by WarthogDemon (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Michael Kozlov seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Michael Kozlov, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability

edit

I haven't really looked to see if you are notable enough for an article in Wikipedia right now. It's possible that you are, by the nature of your research. However, this has to be established by your credentials in the science community as indicated by outside sources, and you have to provide these sources, not your articles, but links to your articles being cited by others, and biographical information about you referenced in citable sources not written by you. Outside of this, and in addition to this, the article must be written in Standard English, not a resume with lists, and not with substandard highlighting and improper bibliographic references (Harvard or MLA or anything is fine, but they have to be standard bibliographic references, not italicized article titles, bolded authors, etc.). KP Botany 05:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply