User talk:KoshVorlon/Archive 46

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 86.13.190.179 in topic The Piccadilly Rats Wikipedia.
Archive 40 Archive 44 Archive 45 Archive 46 Archive 47 Archive 48 Archive 50

Please note that when you use external link-type code, even to on-wiki pages (starting with [https://en.wikipedia.org, you shouldn't use the vertical bar (|) between the link address and the link text. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quit changing my changes

I know you feel my changes were unconstructive but I do not think so, My dad is the head of Wikipedia and you will get banned if you don't stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.138.76.10 (talk) 13:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Well, Dad has three more years to teach you how to edit properly. --NeilN talk to me 13:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Re:

 
Hello, KoshVorlon. You have new messages at Noian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi this is to inform you that as you may have already noticed that from April 13 2017 animax India will no longer air & only time will if they will bring back the channel. Thank you M16bs (talk) 21:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

The Piccadilly Rats Wikipedia.

Hello, I am the manager for the band The Piccadilly Rats and I have noticed that further amendments to the band biography that I added last night have been removed and the article reset back to the previous version. I received your message explaining that this was because the content was considered 'unconstructive'. Exactly what do you mean by that? I have to take exception to your accusation that any of the text was 'unconstructive' because the extra sentences were actually more detailed biography particulars of the various band members. At no point were any defamatory or libellous or indeed offensive language used in my text. I should know what I am writing about because I am also a journalist and can word my text in a suitably appropriate and informative way. I am very disappointed that all my work has been undone and now I have to start again from scratch. I am only acting on the wishes of the band members who contributed the extra bits of text to their respective biographies and carrying out the instructions to make the biographies more comprehensive. In what way is this even considered 'unconstructive'? What sort of criteria or written parameters does one need to adhere to in order to see an article in Wikipedia left as the author or contributor intended it to be?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.190.179 (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)