User talk:Knowledgengine/Non-aqueous phase liquid
Peer-Review
editLead
Starting off with the introductory to the concept and terminology of non-aqueous phase liquids, there is a clear and concise definition with no run-ons to it and is able to intrigue the reader immediately. The inclusion of some draw-backs and other remedies aid in understanding fully the limitations and broad-view of what NAPLs cover.
Structure
As in regards of structure, the layout it easy to read and subheadings are used to appropriately separate different topics and concepts related to that of NAPLs. Additionally, this is appropriate for that of a general wikipedia article and it enjoyable and lengthy for upcoming readers. The presence of such sub-sections like the "Transport Mechanisms" and "Remediation Strategies" allow for further information all along the lines of that of NAPLs.
Coverage
Coverage of the term is broad and concise. There is more than enough information to conclude generalizations, background, and familiarities related to NAPLs. There is not too-much or too little information about a certain topic upon reading. The only thing that might be helpful could be a real-life image or depiction of what NAPLs look like or an effect of what they have on systems or items of use.
Neutrality
Neutrality is key in forming an article with utterly no negative associations between the concept of the topics presented. When it comes to that of the NAPLs, there is no overarching view that takes into account what evidence or research suggests and does not point it towards an opinionated or suggestive point of view.
Source Reliability
Throughout the entire article, the use of documented sources appear to be legitimate and correlated to the topic of the article. It may be out of personal control, but some of the listed documents may have troubling issues to some users. To clarify, the cited sources may not be accessible to some readers. There are certain topics towards the subheadings that do not include a cited source and may question some readers as of where that information has been gather or constructed from. Overall however, cited sources and use of wiki-links have made the article pleasant to read for all interested viewers. Jwright388 (talk) 18:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)