- I would avoid using Sandler's nickname in the lead paragraph unless this is a very common nickname for her - in other words, that this name appears with just as much, if not more, frequency as the name Bernice. I do see where it's used, but not all that often, so this is something that I'd more cover in the personal life section.
- Try not to overuse quotes. These are fine in some situations, but in general they should only be used if there's no potential way to re-write the material.
- Some words like "famously" can be seen as an opinion, as what's famous to one may not be to others and so on, so avoid using these words in an article. If you do use them, make sure that they're specifically attributed to a person or organization, such as "Jane Smith has stated that...".
- Approach claims made in primary sources with caution. In specific I'm referring to the claim that Sandler has achieved many 'firsts', as this is only sourced with the official website. It's very common for people to make claims like this, so you will need some secondary sourcing to help validate them.
- The section "Articles, Conference Proceedings, and Talks" is very lengthy, so you may want to prune this to only cover her most well known work. In general Wikipedia articles will only have a selection of a person's writings of this type as these tend to be numerous and can even go into the triple digits. I'd stick with about 10-15, as opposed to 40. The general rule of thumb is that if you can't find a secondary source about the talk, article, or proceeding, it likely doesn't need to be listed - especially as a list of these should be on her website.
- By large sourcing is good, however some of the sources used aren't considered to be reliable. In specific, IMDb is not considered to be a reliable source since anyone can edit and the site doesn't really do a good job of verifying information.
Other than this, the work looks good and I think that this is just about ready to be moved live. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2018 (UTC)