Duplicate images uploaded

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Windstar 530G sidebyside.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Windharvest 350g 3sidebyside.JPG. The copy called Image:Windharvest 350g 3sidebyside.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Windharvest 350g 3sidebyside.JPG listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Windharvest 350g 3sidebyside.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

NowCommons: File:Image mini.jpeg

edit

File:Image mini.jpeg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Image mini.jpeg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Image mini.jpeg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:17, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply