User talk:Kirk shanahan/Archives/2010/July
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Kirk shanahan in topic COMMENTS: Why Cold Fusion Calorimetry Can’t Be Trusted
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
COMMENTS: Why Cold Fusion Calorimetry Can’t Be Trusted
ADD COMMENTS ON PRIOR SECTION HERE
Wow! This is great! I finally understand! Thanks a load! ---Anonymous (Kirk shanahan (talk) 18:59, 23 July 2010 (UTC))
- You lost me at "Pm = Cp*f*dM/dt*(Tout-Tin)" -- could you please explain each of the variables in that equation? 208.54.5.65 (talk) 20:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- No. sorry, I won't. Because it's not relevant. All I was doing was poining out that most of the time people don't talk about Pm, instead they talk about whatever equation they are using to compute Pm. Just ignore that line in the text and it won't hurt in the least. If you want to know about mass flow calorimetry, Ed Storms has lots of articles posted on his web page, as do Steve Krivit at newenergytimes.com and Jed Rothwell at lenr-canr.org. Kirk shanahan (talk) 11:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- See also [[1]] for a discussion of propagation of error (uncertainty) theory. Kirk shanahan (talk) 11:33, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Well, at least please say what 'k' represents. You mention "k from above" in the first paragraph 'k' appears. 208.54.5.65 (talk) 22:15, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Done Kirk shanahan (talk) 11:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)