![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Kintsukuroi3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
User was blamed as a sockpuppet for some Dolphinof Justice person, but she, as an email search or IP search would reveal, is not that person and she just wants her Wikipedia back. She doesn't know what else to do. She's never faced a situation such as this one before and she really needs help. If nothing can be resolved here, she would like to know how to contact an administration or authority figure that can solve the problem or at least represent Wikipedia. Thank you.
Decline reason:
Tell her to make her own request - and do not edit Wikipedia using her account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Kintsukuroi3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I asked for a review of my account in the sense that I wanted my block removed. The block occurred due to mistaken identity. I asked once for it to be removed, and I was met with what seems to be a misunderstanding. I was speaking in the third person because I thought it would sound more professional than if I whined about it (which I don't plan to do either way) but it seems I either got a misunderstanding (at best) that is bordering on a disregard for how I chose to phrase my appeal. However, I am willing to move beyond that in the hopes that I get a serious evaluation this time. I ask either that you search into my email or IP to prove I am a different person fallen victim to a misidentification that no one will help with, or you direct me to a higher authority who will take my matter into true consideration. I request, please, that I get a serious response. I am but a simple person who has nowhere else to go but here for a request, and I ask that you please don't decline me based on the simple fact that I have submitted a second appeal, for it is what the user above has requested I do (I am just following orders, kind Ma'am or Sir). Please consider (even if I remain blocked) at least resolving that I am not one of the "sock puppets" of the user who seems to have caused my account to be flagged. Thank you, and if you can provide some insight to my situation, I will be very grateful to you. Sincerely, Kintsukuroi3, who just wants to figure out how to fix my identity predicament. ````
Decline reason:
I checked your IP address, as requested. Even if the behavioural evidence didn't very, very clearly mark you as a sockpuppet, the fact that you're editing from the same IP address (and, it appears, the same device) as the other accounts, makes your appeal utterly mendacious. Since you clearly don't plan on being honest with us, I have revoked your access to this page. Yunshui 雲水 07:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.