KingNebx

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KingNebx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my sincere apologies for what you might term as spamming or self promotion. That's not my reason for coming here. Am new here and as such still getting to know how Wikipedia works. Please I will like to tender my unreserved apologies for my actions and also please to be unbanned. I will try in my possible best to always share quality contents.KingNebx (talk) 06:47, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Duplicate. please see below.-- Dlohcierekim 07:54, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2019

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at College Network, Inc. v. Moore Educational Publishers, Inc., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [1] GermanJoe (talk) 09:41, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Apologies

An sorry for that. Won't happen again. Thanks for the heads up. KingNebx (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

OK, I'll consider this a misclick ;) - but please stop adding such links now. It's tempting to do, but Wikipedia is no venue to popularize your own website. Thank you for your consideration. GermanJoe (talk) 16:33, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  caknuck _° needs to be running more often 21:45, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Apologies for my actions.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KingNebx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my sincere apologies for what you might term as spamming or self promotion. That's not my reason for coming here. Am new here and as such still getting to know how Wikipedia works. Please I will like to tender my unreserved apologies for my actions and also please to be unbanned. I will try in my possible best to always share quality contents.KingNebx (talk) 06:47, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You were final warned for adding this spam link . You apologised and said you would not do it again. Then, you did it again. Ordinarily, I would offer the condition of not spamming or editing about that website again, but you already broke that promise. You would also need to describe what "quality" edits you would make. -- Dlohcierekim 07:52, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.