Kindanyume

Welcome

Hello, Kindanyume, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Best Buy

what is your problem with my edits??? Do you enjoy being an edit bully?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kindanyume (talk • contribs)

The problem with your edits are that they are extremely biased. The site is not a reliable source because there is no editorial oversight. The guy who runs it can write whatever he feels like and there is no way to verify the information. Your own personal experiences also don't matter and statements like I will also be writing up my own personal experience with them for others to read and take as fair warning. are completely out of place and indicate that you are looking to provide your own original research for the article. That is not acceptable. If you want to provide an argument when your block expires, do so on the talk page of the article. --Onorem 21:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

Your comments "edit bullies will be resisted" sound very similar to the same comments that Memejojo has made on the Best Buy talk page. You are quite obviously a sockpuppet of Memejojo. B2bomber81 02:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

On the contrary I am anything but a sock puppet... all I know of Memejojo was the comments I had read.

July 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The CW, you may be blocked from editing. Railfan23 (talk) 01:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello Railfan23,

I dont know you or anything about you beyond a very brief scan on wiki and while that appears to display you are a more active user/editor vs the majority it does not have a flashing neon sign beside your name saying "special authority" or anything of the sort. It simply labels you the same as most of us aka 'user' and while I've no doubt you have contributed to the benefit of wiki and thereby the public.. te 1st question is no offense intended but to be blunt... where are your manners?

Before accusing anyone as you did myself you had best take a closer look at the facts and at the very least you should attempt to contact the person(s) in question BEFORE deleting anything including additions by others unless such is beyond unmistakeable and intentional vandalism. (Say a hard core porn picture or pedophelia added to a page intended or kids as an example common sense says is obviously inappropriate and requiring immediate action).

The irony is the very start of wikis page regarding disputes states that explicitly!!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution#Follow_the_normal_protocol

(Now warning this is long but i suspect you will understand far more after reading this and perhaps grasp why your actions thus are are unacceptable)

I am contesting your deletion of my edit / additional info regarding the CW and their "CW Seed" site. I therefore am giving you the opertunity and expect you to undo your deletions ASAP beore anything else. Once that is done if you have a problem with the material I added to the page you should at the least start by contacting me again and explaining yourself since your actios thus far are unacceptable (and ironically come quite close to the posted definition of vandalism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism.)

If you refuse reverse the deletions in question without delay especially before even contacting me as you should have in the first place. I will have no choice but to undo your unjustifiable deletions while seeking a higher authority on wiki to block you from repeating such actions in the future. I would of course rather not have to do such since that is a huge waste of time..

The vast majority of people I know think of wikipedia as a site or information that is supposed to be a source of honest facts, information and varying opinions as well at times. My edits added factual info to the page in question. None of what I did was vandalism nor disruptive editing contrary to your claims regardless of your personal opinion on such.

Everything I added to the page is actual and accurate, easily verifiable and honest. It does not sugar coat anything at all nor does it exclude inormation that again is cold hard reality regrdless of how it makes anyone else feel. Bits that are obviouslly started as an opinion are quite clear and again are accurate and while they are not all fuzzy and warm it is none the less valid and if anything brutally honest statement regarding the page in question. Againn you may not like it or the manner iin which it was said but that does not justiy your actions at all.

The image I created and which you flagged for deletion is 100% within both the copyright fair use rules and wiki's policies or such. It is a snapshot of the site provided by the copyright holder as detailed in my edit. There was even notes added to it when uploaded explicitly explaining what it is, why it is there, whom owns the copyright for the logos etc etc. You can't get a simpler clean cut example of brutal honesty and fair use than presenting a screen cap of the site as it is preseted to the world by the copyright holder themselves for FREE. It also was given added info regarding the fact that those with what is deemed to be a US based IP by CWs servers/scripting will NOT see the site as thhe screen cap shows. Therefore to aid in anyone reading such info ability to litterally see proof of what is said the screen cap is the best possibly way to do so.

(BTW technically under international copyright law I could also claim copyright of the screen cap personally regardless of it containing the logos since the image by the letter of thw law does connstitute an original work. I however couldnt be bothered with that nor do I have any wish to lay any claim to their Logos etc.. other than within the above mentioned fair use and as evidence of what the CW themselves present to the public. So on that note even the lawyers at CW wouldnt say squat about the screen cap. Why you chose to do so would therefore be the question of choice.)

Now you may not like the facts or the manner in which I stated them. However that does not change the facts nor does your personal opinion regarding the truth make it any less so.

Now given theis inormation it does bring up the question why you did not 1st attempt to message me beore going ahead and editing the page by way of deleting my additions. This brings up many further questions such as:

Do you have any personal connection wiith the CW? Do you have a bias towards facts presented by those outside of the USA? Are you some sort of strange copyright enorcement zealot that dosn't like the info presented despite the fact that everything I added is 100% honest , factual and legal. What was your reasoning behind the deletion of my edit/additions to the page in question?

I have told the truth with the additions I made to the page in question from the very start and as always I dont sugar coat it. The facts are what they are and personal feelings regarding such does not change them. Nor does blatant attempts to hide them from the public such as your actions of deleting them.

Irony there is the dolts at the CW stand to beneit from reading what I added since it might just clue them into cold hard reality and thereby help them improve on their projects in the future. It also allows those in the US a chance to see what is being presented to the rest o the world. And finally it also could help anyone that is falsely ID'd by the CW servers as being outside o the US some information as to what reallly going on. Ive seen multiple instances o such things happen over the years since attempts at IP blocking are clumsy at best and tankfully easily bypassed (also perectly legal) especially wwith current tech levels being very user friendly.

Oh and btw just in case you are unaware the word DOLT in this case litterally is one of the best possible labels to describe those at the CW that are in charge of the farce of the CW Seed site.

A mental retard who is clueless not only about current events, but also has the IQ level of a rock. A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time. Many times they are oblivious to their own mental incapacity.

Look at the facts I put forth including the act that they are so out of touch with reality they ailed to even include ANY contact info on the "restricted access" page and the act that they continue to act as if the world stops at the US Borders.

I also pointed out the facts that they whine when such attempts at a site/service fail and they continue to fail due to their being oblivious to reality... and they reuse to learn even decades later.

A case in point last week I was asked to track down a HD copy of a specific television series. The series in question was only released on bluray in Germany several years ago for some unknown reason (But the production company or X series is notorious or shooting themselves in the foot so they are the most likely cause).

I found a supplier with a used set they wanted to sell for X$. But they reuse to clue in that X$ was beyond stupid. Not only could a brand new copy of the fame set be had for $12 more but the series was also available via amazon prime in HD and without the issues o the idiotic region coding which would need to be bypassed. Not hard to do thankully (and is perectly legal in almost every country.. even the US or personal use despite the draconian DMCA mess.. and much the the MPAA/studios dislay o course) but act is it serves zero purpose other than it being blatant attempt at price fixing to rip off the public.. and that such deserves its owwn page on wiki)

The seller of the used set got absurdly angry that the person that wanted the series refused to pay their asking price.. depite the act what they were selling was less easy to use, it was used and ultimately it was considerably more $$$. The person instead nabbed the HD copy from Amazon instead and for less than 60% of the price the used source was trying to demand.

Now to apply that same logic to the CW.. they reuse to supply x series outside of the USA, they ail to provide alternative sources or those wanting to nab such. They dont even give contact info on the "normal" page or the rest of the world that is not in the USA... and then despite the fact they are acting as if nothing outside of the US borders matters they continue to rant and rave about people not getting X content from them and that the #s or viewers are not accurate etc etc.. and try to make excuses to their bosses whom expected a positive outcome.. not a negative one that not only fails to achieve the original goals of the site but also has ticked off the non-US public and such tends to remember bad experiences for a very long time.

End note.. I noticed some one has 'An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sock puppet of Memejojo' I havnt got a clue what editor or whom Memejojo is but Im sure no sock puppet lol And I'll be investigating that soon as tie permits (Sick as a dog here atm along with my 4yr old whom gave me this evil bug.. so I/m not spending much time on this atm.. as can be seen in the time delay from when Railfan went on his/her deleting ride and my response today) Kindanyume (talk) 21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Your edits were unsourced and clearly vastly at odds with WP:NOV. They are unsuitable for an encyclopedia. If you don't want to be accused of vandalism, don't vandalise articles. It's pretty simple. Railfan23 (talk) 01:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

If you do wish to seek the opinion of an administrator, there is a list of them at Category:Wikipedia administrators. Alternatively you can file a query at the Administrator's noticeboard. Make sure you follow the instructions at the top of the page. I'd also recommend you keep it short and to the point, if you write a long screed like the above it is less likely to be read by the administrators. Good luck, Railfan23 (talk) 02:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Screen cap cwseed.com restricted access page for non-US viewers.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Screen cap cwseed.com restricted access page for non-US viewers.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Railfan23 (talk) 01:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)