Khpd

January 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
3. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Thanks Stephen G. Brown for this warning. But:

"Avoid posting a generic warning template if actively involved in the edit war, it can be seen as aggressive. Consider writing your own note to the user specifically appropriate for the situation, with a view to explicitly cooling things down." From Wikipedia:Edit warring. Maybe you should give this warning to yourself, as you deserve it as much as I do.--Khpd (talk) 13:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

• There seems to be a lack of consensus for inclusion of this image. Accordingly, it is up to you to justify its inclusion. The proper venue for that is the article's Talk page, not edit summaries. Thanks. Rodhullandemu 18:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Rodhull, the burden of evidence has nothing to do with whether a photo is approppriate or not, but with the reliability of a source. And at the time you sent your message, the matter was already being discussed on the Talk page.--Khpd (talk) 11:35, 31 January 2011 (UTC)