Khatri2903

Today Expedition

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thind, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Downforwiki (talk) 14:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Please stop undoing the edits ,

i have added all the necessary sources and references,

you are undoing and vandalizing the name of the Sodhi Clan, it's the Clan of the Khatris , not Jatts , stop spreading misinformation or provide primary source of information.

thanks Khatri2903 (talk) 14:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Its have been discussed in the talk archive conducted during the Last week of June you can see it for any misconceptions I don’t want to waste your and my time either in other case please read Wikipedia Vandalism policy by @Khatri2903 Downforwiki (talk) 14:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

I am notifying you Last time today Please understand the Census Policy of Wikipedia in its true aspects or Consequences topic is not resembling any Pov whether its Khatri Or Jats but it totally based on census Mechanism consolidate me for any further clarification Downforwiki (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

The page also contains information of Gurus, and all Gurus strictly belonged to Khatri Caste only, please stop vandalizing and "undoing" without adding PRIMARY source and reliable information

Sodhi clan is of Khatris, if you have a dispute with this, please provide the primary source.

thanks

if you think this page talks about different Sodhi Clan that is not related to Gurus then please remove all names of Gurus and make is strictly about whatever tribe is the parallel Khatri2903 (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

In short the Sources former editor mentioned to be on the point and usually verified by Json Publications and recognised under solitary scholarship without any turbulence See bellow our discussion, Apperently I am going to remove disruptive edit summary and Its my Last conformity with you

References

you are using books written by non-natives as a source of information which was not even written in the time period to begin with,

i can provide multiple primary sources and i have cited some reliable sources as well, you have only provided ONE source which is a contemporary book that has one line that could very well be a misunderstanding by the author itself.

this is my last request to you to not undo edits OR alternatively if you think you are so correct , to remove Gurus from the page itself because like i have cited and replied before , 7 Gurus belonged to Sodhi Khatri Clan. Khatri2903 (talk) 14:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Have a great time Looks like a duck to me Downforwiki (talk) 17:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Downforwiki (talk) 14:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

this is my last request to you about not vandalizing and using unconfirmed books written by non-natives as a source of information , i will undo whatever edits you make in a good faith to keep the name of Gurus untarnished as 7 of them belonged to Sodhi Khatri Clan

References

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Anachronist (talk) 17:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khatri2903 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been falsely blocked claiming that I am someone with another account, I was merely correcting an article which was vandalism in the first place as some other user just made an accusation and and got me banned and an admin undid my changes without considering to what i was pointing to, the article has a false information based on a single line of text in a book with no supplementary or primary source to confirm it. I also added multiple supplementary reliable sources like Britannica to as reference , I still got falsely banned. if you compare that article with any other source in the world that can not be edited or be a part of conspiracy via edits, it will reflect the information I was trying to change to. It's a request to unban and undo the changes of article "Sodhi" , thanks.

Decline reason:

I believe that the reason for the block is correct. It is possible that you yourself do not have more than one account, but that would only make this meat puppetry. You created your account almost immediately after the other account was blocked, this is difficult to accept as a coincidence, especially when editing about a formally designated contentious topic area(castes/South Asian social groups). 331dot (talk) 07:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khatri2903 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

A ban based on assumptions does no justice to someone who was merely correcting a vandalized article, I humbly request you to check my edits. I am only correcting my clan's name being linked with another tribe based on a single line of text from a book which also could be "coincidence", the line in context is also not primary information in the first place which also does not have any other supplementary source, The article also contains names of Gurus of my faith "Sikhism" which does no justice either. castes/social groups are sensitive topic i understand , that is why I was trying to edit with references from quality sources. we can only contribute to make it better. Thanks Khatri2903 (talk) 14:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Technical data shows  Possible, but it's confused a bit by your use of proxies. Regardless, the connection is far closer than would be expected if this was a coincidence. Even if you are a different person, though, and that's certainly possible, we simply don't want caste/clan WP:BATTLEGROUND editors here. It's wildly inappropriate. Yamla (talk) 18:13, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It isn't an assumption that you created your account not long after the other account was blocked. That's documented in logs. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 16:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khatri2903 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do not know what proxies you are talking about, i created an account because wikipedia recommended me to do so, and I never intend to harm the article but to only correct what is written, also , you are correct that wikipedia is not a battleground for clans ,a specific clan has been editing articles and trying to link Khatris with "jats" with ZERO primary and no supplementary sources, Khatris have a rich history and by adding/sneaking their tribe/community names in our pages is a conspiracy, I humbly request you to look into it , I have no interest in anything else but to correct my clans name and to keep my communities name untarnished from vandalism by other tribes/communities trying to create links. I believe as a moderator it is your duty to see the information in the article has supplementary and quality sources, rather than banning for correcting.

Decline reason:

Your appeal essentially states that you intend to continue making POV edits in an area where you are conflicted. I wouldn't consider an unblock without a WP:CASTE topic ban, and as you note that's the only area you're interested in editing, your appeal is declined. Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.