Welcome!

Hello, KevinLuna83, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 19:48, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Maryland in the American Civil War edit

Hi KevinLuna83, I see you have twice deleted the contemporary quote "even though we have the constitutional authority to take such action". It may or may not be the case that Maryland had the right to secede from the Union in 1861. But what is surely not in doubt is that the legislature believed that they had that right, though they in fact chose not to exercise it. ---Asteuartw (talk) 07:44, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Antietam edit

According to McClellan's official battle report, the Union casualties were 2,010 killed, 9,416 wounded, 1,043 missing, and 12,469 total. http://antietam.aotw.org/exhibit.php?exhibit_id=19 KevinLuna83 (talk) 04:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. We usually use secondary sources for this. As you can see from footnote #3, there is a range of published figures and the ones in the information box seem to be about the consensus. Hal Jespersen (talk) 01:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Why did you change the wording of a quotation? edit

At Mesha Stele you changed the name Jehavah to Yahweh, despite the fact that it is a quotation. Why? Dougweller (talk) 10:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I changed it because it's a misquote. The god's name is Yahweh, not Jehovah. KevinLuna83 (talk) 10:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
It is not a misquote, I checked it. The sources uses Jehovah. You can't make changes in a quotation on the basis that you think it's wrong. Dougweller (talk) 11:29, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timeline of the American Civil War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timeline of the American Civil War edit

 

Hello KevinLuna83. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Timeline of the American Civil War".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timeline of the American Civil War}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jackson's Valley Campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Shields (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Department of the Rappahannock edit

Thanks for creating Department of the Rappahannock.

A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 23:49, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mountain Department moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Mountain Department, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mountain Department edit

 

Hello, KevinLuna83. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mountain Department".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:05, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply