Keriansial
| Wikipedia:Babel | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
A barnstar for you!
edit
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed. Thank you very much for helping and editing the Matthew E. May page. Matteoben (🗨️ • 🏴) 17:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much! Appreicate it. Keriansial (talk) 16:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit (blether) 15:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)- @Girth Summit, I seriously believe there is a mistake because I am not related to this Bennet43. I also do not know Matteoben who sent me a barnstar few days ago. I am requesting you again to double check my account. I am not a sockpuppet or has any other accounts on Wikipedia. Some of my edits on the French Wikipedia were done when I didn't have an account. Keriansial (talk) 05:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Keriansial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am formally requesting to unblock of my Wikipedia account, blocked as a sock of Bennet43. I firmly believe that a critical mistake has occurred, linking my account to the user Bennet43. Furthermore, I have no knowledge of or association with the user named Matteoben, who recently sent me a barnstar.
I am humbly requesting that you conduct a thorough review of my account to rectify any potential errors in the association with Bennet43 or any other users. It is of paramount importance to me to emphasize that I am not a sockpuppet and do not maintain any additional accounts on Wikipedia. My sole intention is to contribute positively to the Wikipedia community while adhering to its rules and policies.
I would also like to bring to your attention that some of the edits I made on the French Wikipedia were completed before I even had an account on the platform. I am an ardent Wikipedia contributor who deeply values the integrity and transparency of the platform. I wish to continue sharing my contributions without any ambiguity or misunderstanding.
I understand that maintaining the credibility and quality of Wikipedia is of utmost importance, and I share the same goal. If my account is unblocked, I pledge to:
- Abide by Wikipedia's content guidelines, including neutrality and verifiability.
- Avoid any behavior that could be considered disruptive or against Wikipedia's policies.
- Collaborate with other editors and engage in constructive discussions when disagreements arise.
I believe that granting me a second chance will not only benefit me but also contribute positively to the Wikipedia community. I value the opportunity to continue sharing knowledge and contributing to this valuable resource.
I am open to any necessary discussions, guidance, or restrictions to ensure that my contributions align with Wikipedia's standards. Please consider my request for unblocking my account, and I am ready to cooperate fully to maintain a harmonious and informative Wikipedia environment.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Keriansial (talk) 16:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I get the sense that a bot wrote most of this request; we would prefer to hear from you, not a bot. Please write a request in your own words. Even leaving that aside, none of this addresses the reasons for the block described in the SPI. 331dot (talk) 19:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.