Ken vs ryu
Speedy deletion nomination of Best Performing Stocks of 2015
editHello Ken vs ryu,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Best Performing Stocks of 2015 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fbdave (talk) 03:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Best Performing Stocks of 2015
editHello, Ken vs ryu,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Best Performing Stocks of 2015 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Performing Stocks of 2015 .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
The article Best Performing Stocks 2000-2010 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphan based on one short article, lacks notability for the subject (which is only for US stocks anyway). Similar articles could be made for all countries, for all periods, no reason to single out this one.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
The article Best Performing Stocks of 2014 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No notability for this specific selection (one year, one stock exchange only).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)