User talk:Kcarey2/sandbox

Peer Review

There is no draft to peer review. The link to the group sandbox brings me to this users sandbox that consists of just source links. First ebscohost source link did not work; failed to bring me to the article/ source used. Second article link did work: After downloading the PDF, the article seems to be from a reliable source on information relevant to the users topic of Net Neutrality. The article describes the guidelines of Net Neutrality Rules that must be followed. Ecalam1 (talk) 18:36, 28 October 2018 (UTC)ecalam1

Just wanted to re review real quick and tell you that there is only source links with no citations especially the first one which brings me to a random site. There is a lack of neutral tone when using words such as struck down which give an imposing vocabulary instead of reduced and since none of this looks fixed still.. wanted to let you know again Tmglastinger (talk) 02:20, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review

As another student stated, there is no draft to critique. The sources seem like a good start and head in the right direction, but without a draft there's no way to tell what's going to be done with the information. There are rough ideas, or statements, in the sandbox that could be easily developed into a working draft. The links worked for me so I was at least able to look at the sources, which appear reputable. Without any further information, I cannot review their work. MatthieuMcIntosh (talk) 02:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)