Kavakdere

Again:Minor

You have been told this before, even if you have now removed it from your TP: You are not supposed to mark your edits as minor if they are not. Please read WP:Minor, especially the subsection "When not to mark". False use of the "Minor" mark-up is considered poor etiquette, and may be regarded as disruptive. --T*U (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello. Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You've been unfortunately POV-pushing on multiple articles in the self-made attempt to place Turkey in a "European" grouping without any sourcing, introducing deliberate factual errors en mass. Turkey is for 97% located in Asia, not a part of the EU, a Muslim nation with a Middle Eastern culture, and borders Iraq, Syria and what not. It has never ever been considered a part of Europe, and especially not Western Europe, (which adding of it seems to make you so happy on numerous occasions [1]-[2]-[3]-[4]) other than for certain modern statistical/political reasons. Continuing to POV push stuff like this without sourcing is considered purely disruptive and won't make you last for long on this place. Please cease making these nonsensical ungrounded bogus additions. Take my advise. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

For the last time: Minor

I see that you still mark most of your edits as minor. You already have been asked three times to read WP:Minor. It states that "Adding or removing content in an article" is not considered to be a minor edit. Also: "If you are in doubt about whether an edit is minor or not, it is always safer not to mark it as minor". Please refrain from deceptive use of the minor marking. Four warnings ought to be enough. --T*U (talk) 09:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Turks in Poland and Demographics of Denmark, you may be blocked from editing. - LouisAragon (talk) 00:16, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Tell me how on earth I am incorrect, for one second let us ignore facts and let you amuse me. Tell me that Turkey is not part of the Western European Group in the UN, a western oriented nation, a cold war member of nato and part of the WEST, and how on earth these factors do not apply now, yet post communist poland, geopolitically part of eastern europe, and bosnia, are both part of the West and not Turkey?

African immigration to Europe

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to African immigration to Europe. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Turkey

* Hello. I was extremely surprised when I noticed your edit (but mostly the insane edit summary) to Turkey at [5]. The user who re-added the coat of arms, even after warnings from people that a consensus had not been reached, was an IP user at [6]. Please don't write edit summaries like that. You said:

"Whoever you are, this is your last chance. I will report you for vandalism. Turkey has no emblem, no coat of arms and no symbol. This is Turkey's modernity. COME BACK ONCE YOU CHANGED CANADA'S PAGE AND PUT A MAPLE LEAF FOR AN EMBLEM"

That is not really so useful. The edit was fine, but your edit summary is horrible, and could possibly be counted as a personal attack towards another editor. Please read the guidelines on wp:edit summary before you continue editing. Thanks, _{Adotchar| reply here} 12:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

 Note: Also, see [7]. Almost the same thing. Please don't do this again. _{Adotchar| reply here} 12:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Canada actually have real royal Coat of arms but some copyright assholes keeping to removing it like if someone care but they are just retards. Add the got damn halfmoon it looks better they have it on passports so its just adherence to detail. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 01:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

<!DOCTYPE html>

<html prefix="dc: http://purl.org/dc/terms/ mw: http://mediawiki.org/rdf/" about="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Redirect/revision/760193695"><head prefix="mwr: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Redirect/"><meta property="mw:TimeUuid" content="eea3a592-db31-11e6-86e6-f1139b99eb49"/><meta charset="utf-8"/><meta property="mw:pageNamespace" content="3"/><meta property="mw:pageId" content="48847858"/><link rel="dc:replaces" resource="mwr:revision/760025489"/><meta property="dc:modified" content="2017-01-15T14:50:17.000Z"/><meta property="mw:revisionSHA1" content="4ab2921982b8487912b6ab07b38917e7df75713a"/><meta property="mw:html:version" content="1.3.0"/><link rel="dc:isVersionOf" href="//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk%3AKavakdere"/><title>User_talk:Kavakdere</title><base href="//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/"/><link rel="stylesheet" href="//en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php?modules=mediawiki.legacy.commonPrint%2Cshared%7Cmediawiki.skinning.content%7Cmediawiki.skinning.content.parsoid%7Cmediawiki.skinning.elements%7Cmediawiki.skinning.interface%7Csite%7Cskins.vector.styles%7Cext.cite.style%7Cmediawiki.page.gallery.styles&only=styles&skin=vector"/></head><body id="mwAA" lang="en" class="mw-content-ltr sitedir-ltr ltr mw-body mw-body-content mediawiki" dir="ltr">

Again:Minor

You have been told this before, even if you have now removed it from your TP: You are not supposed to mark your edits as minor if they are not. Please read <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Minor" title="Wikipedia:Minor" id="mwAw">WP:Minor</a>, especially the subsection "When not to mark". False use of the "Minor" mark-up is considered poor etiquette, and may be regarded as disruptive. --<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:TU-nor" title="User:TU-nor" id="mwBA">T*U</a> (<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:TU-nor" title="User talk:TU-nor" id="mwBQ">talk</a>) 15:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

<a href="./File:Information_orange.svg" id="mwCA"><img alt="Information icon" resource="./File:Information_orange.svg" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f0/Information_orange.svg/25px-Information_orange.svg.png" data-file-width="256" data-file-height="256" data-file-type="drawing" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f0/Information_orange.svg/50px-Information_orange.svg.png 2x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f0/Information_orange.svg/38px-Information_orange.svg.png 1.5x" height="25" width="25" id="mwCQ"/></a> Hello. Please do not add or change content without citing a <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources" title="Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources" id="mwCg">reliable source</a>. Please review the guidelines at <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Citing_sources" title="Wikipedia:Citing sources" id="mwCw">Wikipedia:Citing sources</a> and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You've been unfortunately POV-pushing on multiple articles in the self-made attempt to place Turkey in a "European" grouping without any sourcing, introducing deliberate factual errors en mass. Turkey is for 97% located in Asia, not a part of the EU, a Muslim nation with a Middle Eastern culture, and borders Iraq, Syria and what not. It has never ever been considered a part of Europe, and especially not Western Europe, (<a rel="mw:ExtLink" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turks_in_Poland&diff=713392287&oldid=667055635" id="mwDw">which adding of it seems to make you so happy</a> on numerous occasions <a rel="mw:ExtLink" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Belgium&diff=prev&oldid=711413291" id="mwEA"></a>-<a rel="mw:ExtLink" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Western_Europe&diff=prev&oldid=703895108" id="mwEQ"></a>-<a rel="mw:ExtLink" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index&diff=prev&oldid=703322027" id="mwEg"></a>-<a rel="mw:ExtLink" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Western_Europe&diff=prev&oldid=703285501" id="mwEw"></a>) other than for certain modern statistical/political reasons. Continuing to <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:POV" title="Wikipedia:POV" id="mwFA">POV push</a> stuff like this without sourcing is considered purely disruptive and won't make you last for long on this place. Please cease making these nonsensical ungrounded bogus additions. Take my advise. Bests - <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:LouisAragon" title="User:LouisAragon" id="mwFQ">LouisAragon</a> (<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:LouisAragon" title="User talk:LouisAragon" id="mwFg">talk</a>) 14:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

For the last time: Minor

I see that you still mark most of your edits as minor. You already have been asked three times to read <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Minor" title="Wikipedia:Minor" id="mwGA">WP:Minor</a>. It states that "Adding or removing content in an article" is not considered to be a minor edit. Also: "If you are in doubt about whether an edit is minor or not, it is always safer not to mark it as minor". Please refrain from deceptive use of the minor marking. Four warnings ought to be enough. --<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:TU-nor" title="User:TU-nor" id="mwGg">T*U</a> (<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:TU-nor" title="User talk:TU-nor" id="mwGw">talk</a>) 09:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

<a href="./File:Nuvola_apps_important.svg" id="mwHg"><img alt="Warning icon" resource="./File:Nuvola_apps_important.svg" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/25px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png" data-file-width="600" data-file-height="500" data-file-type="drawing" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/50px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png 2x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/38px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png 1.5x" height="21" width="25" id="mwHw"/></a> Please stop your <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing" title="Wikipedia:Disruptive editing" id="mwIA">disruptive editing</a>. If you continue to <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Vandalism" title="Wikipedia:Vandalism" id="mwIQ">vandalize</a> pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Turks_in_Poland" title="Turks in Poland" id="mwIg">Turks in Poland</a> and <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Demographics_of_Denmark" title="Demographics of Denmark" id="mwIw">Demographics of Denmark</a>, you may be <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Blocking_policy" title="Wikipedia:Blocking policy" id="mwJA">blocked from editing</a>. - <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:LouisAragon" title="User:LouisAragon" id="mwJg">LouisAragon</a> (<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:LouisAragon" title="User talk:LouisAragon" id="mwJw">talk</a>) 00:16, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Tell me how on earth I am incorrect, for one second let us ignore facts and let you amuse me. Tell me that Turkey is not part of the Western European Group in the UN, a western oriented nation, a cold war member of nato and part of the WEST, and how on earth these factors do not apply now, yet post communist poland, geopolitically part of eastern europe, and bosnia, are both part of the West and not Turkey?

African immigration to Europe

<img alt="" resource="./File:Ambox_warning_pn.svg" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/25px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png" data-file-width="512" data-file-height="445" data-file-type="drawing" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/50px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png 2x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/38px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png 1.5x" height="22" width="25" id="mwLA"/> Please stop adding <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Citing_sources" title="Wikipedia:Citing sources" id="mwLQ">unsourced</a> content, as you did to <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./African_immigration_to_Europe" title="African immigration to Europe" id="mwLg">African immigration to Europe</a>. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Verifiability" title="Wikipedia:Verifiability" id="mwLw">verifiability</a>. If you continue to do so, you may be <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Blocking_policy" title="Wikipedia:Blocking policy" id="mwMA">blocked</a> from editing Wikipedia. <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:Cordless_Larry" title="User:Cordless Larry" id="mwMQ">Cordless Larry</a> (<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:Cordless_Larry" title="User talk:Cordless Larry" id="mwMg">talk</a>) 20:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Turkey

<img alt="Nota bene" resource="./File:Ambox important.svg" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Ambox_important.svg/23px-Ambox_important.svg.png" data-file-width="40" data-file-height="40" data-file-type="drawing" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Ambox_important.svg/46px-Ambox_important.svg.png 2x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Ambox_important.svg/35px-Ambox_important.svg.png 1.5x" height="23" width="23"/>* Hello. I was extremely surprised when I noticed your edit (but mostly the insane edit summary) to <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Turkey" title="Turkey">Turkey</a> at <a rel="mw:ExtLink" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turkey&curid=11125639&diff=752968206&oldid=752967413"></a>. The user who re-added the coat of arms, even after warnings from people that a consensus had not been reached, was an IP user at <a rel="mw:ExtLink" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/212.252.85.62"></a>. Please don't write edit summaries like that. You said:

"Whoever you are, this is your last chance. I will report you for vandalism. Turkey has no emblem, no coat of arms and no symbol. This is Turkey's modernity. COME BACK ONCE YOU CHANGED CANADA'S PAGE AND PUT A MAPLE LEAF FOR AN EMBLEM"

That is not really so useful. The edit was fine, but your edit summary is horrible, and could possibly be counted as a personal attack towards another editor. Please read the guidelines on <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Edit_summary" title="Wikipedia:Edit summary" id="mwNg">wp:edit summary</a> before you continue editing. Thanks, _{<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:Adotchar" title="User:Adotchar" id="mwOA">Adotchar</a>|<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:Adotchar" title="User talk:Adotchar" id="mwOg"> reply here</a>} 12:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

<img resource="./File:Pictogram_voting_info.svg" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4a/Pictogram_voting_info.svg/20px-Pictogram_voting_info.svg.png" data-file-width="250" data-file-height="250" data-file-type="drawing" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4a/Pictogram_voting_info.svg/40px-Pictogram_voting_info.svg.png 2x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4a/Pictogram_voting_info.svg/30px-Pictogram_voting_info.svg.png 1.5x" height="20" width="20"/> Note: Also, see <a rel="mw:ExtLink" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turkey&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=752070489" id="mwPg"></a>. Almost the same thing. Please don't do this again. _{<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:Adotchar" title="User:Adotchar" id="mwQA">Adotchar</a>|<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:Adotchar" title="User talk:Adotchar" id="mwQg"> reply here</a>} 12:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Canada actually have real royal Coat of arms but some copyright assholes keeping to removing it like if someone care but they are just retards. Add the got damn halfmoon it looks better they have it on passports so its just adherence to detail. --<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:ThecentreCZ" title="User:ThecentreCZ" id="mwRQ">ThecentreCZ</a> (<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:ThecentreCZ" title="User talk:ThecentreCZ" id="mwRg">talk</a>) 01:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Western Europe

Unless you've been living under a rock, you'd probably be aware most countries in Europe, including all those in NATO and the EU, can be considered geo-politically western. This is not related to the Western Europe grouping, which is cultural. Greece is considered culturally western, Turkey is certainly not. It arguable not even European. If it is, then it's probably closest to the Balkan states, not western Europe. I mean you can't seriously think Turkey should be grouped with the UK, France, Spain, etc? Still, even Greece is not commonly referred to as part of western Europe. <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:Rob984" title="User:Rob984" id="mwSQ">Rob984</a> (<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:Rob984" title="User talk:Rob984" id="mwSg">talk</a>) 14:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Also change your attitude in edit summaries, I see it's a persistent issue. Unpleasant and condescending. Wikipedia can do without editors who feel the need to behave like that. <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:Rob984" title="User:Rob984" id="mwTA">Rob984</a> (<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:Rob984" title="User talk:Rob984" id="mwTQ">talk</a>) 14:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Let me give you a small history lesson on geopolitics. You seem you need it. Turkey joined NATO before Spain and Germany. Turkey had democracy before Spain, GREECE, Cyprus, Portugal and during WORLD WAR TWO where even British elections were not held. Turkey has a free market economy for centuries. Turkey had democratic institutions even during the Ottoman Empire. Turkey is a country that is secular and Britain is not. Now if I changed the name Turkey to Scotland... what would be the difference? That is is Christian? You are so wrong it is impossible to answer you without insult. Turkey is more bloody western than most of Europe, since most of Europe was EITHER A COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP (yes now westernised but then again Turkey has always been westernised, building on your point on cultural westernisation) AND THE OTHER HALF MONARCHIES OR WITH FASCIST DIKTATS. Please learn something better if you are interested in it. Noe try to remove my edits again I will have to report you... why? Because everything I said IS FACT.... — Preceding <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:Signatures" title="Wikipedia:Signatures" id="mwUg">unsigned</a> comment added by <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:Kavakdere" title="User:Kavakdere" id="mwUw">Kavakdere</a> (<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:Kavakdere#top" title="User talk:Kavakdere" id="mwVA">talk</a> • <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Special:Contributions/Kavakdere" title="Special:Contributions/Kavakdere" id="mwVQ">contribs</a>) 09:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Western Europe is a geographical region. The Czech Republic is westernised, but it's not in Western Europe. Anyway, you need consensus to make changes to Wikipedia. Take this as your warning, if you edit war, I will report you per WP:3RR. See <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:CONSENSUS" title="Wikipedia:CONSENSUS" id="mwWg">WP:CONSENSUS</a> and <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:EDITWAR" title="Wikipedia:EDITWAR" id="mwWw">WP:EDITWAR</a>. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's other policies, including <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./Wikipedia:CIVILITY" title="Wikipedia:CIVILITY" id="mwXA">WP:CIVILITY</a>. <a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User:Rob984" title="User:Rob984" id="mwXQ">Rob984</a> (<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./User_talk:Rob984" title="User talk:Rob984" id="mwXg">talk</a>) 14:48, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

</body></html>

I dont remember any threat to this so called war of edits. If western europe was a geographical region... then why is Italy and Finland in it? Vienna is eastwards of Prague. Helsinki eastwards of Warsaw. This is GEOPOLITICS my good friend so I will have to make the factual changes...

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kavakdere. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)