Deletion discussion about INSIKA edit

Hello, Kassenwart,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether INSIKA should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INSIKA .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:28, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with INSIKA edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, INSIKA, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.insika.de/images/stories/INSIKA/insika%20flyer%202012-09%20en.pdf. As a copyright violation, INSIKA appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. INSIKA has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:INSIKA and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:INSIKA with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:INSIKA.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please see Talk:Insika --Kassenwart (talk) 06:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

INSIKA edit

Frankly, I doubt that INSIKA is notable enough to have a standalone encyclopedia article. If you are involved with them, I would recommend that you have a look at our conflict of interest guideline as well. Even assuming that the copyright issue were resolved, your own description of the program is not written from a neutral point of view.

My recommendation, if you really think that INSIKA meets our inclusion criteria for products and businesses, would be to try to work up a neutral, non-promotional version that does not copy your original text and submit it to Articles for Creation. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:30, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

INSIKA is a standard for the protection of tax-relevant data that was developed by the German metrology institute (a government organization). It is not a commercial product (of course it is used in POS systems and taximeters which are commercial products). In 2008 the Ministry of Finance planned to introduce it as a legal requirement. This issue is still under discussion in various countries. So I would say the relevance for Wikipedia is similar to e.g. SAF-T. I have to make up my mind if it's worth investing the work to write a new article with the risk that this is in vain... --Kassenwart (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply