Edits to Jane Smiley and Moo

edit

May I ask why you are so insistent on linking Smiley's novel Moo to a page where readers will find no useful information about that novel? I don't see the worth in adding misleading links like this. Also, linking the title Moo in the article Moo is not helpful. A page can't link to itself, and the link will just appear in bold text. I have reverted your edits. If you would like to create an article for the novel, that would be most welcome. Simply follow this red link...Moo (novel)...and you can begin writing and editing the article. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

--ShelfSkewed talk 03:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, again. You made a very impressive start on the Moo article, and you seem to have had some helpers. I hope you (and your helpers?) will continue by citing the sources, if any, for this material—especially the quotations in the final section. If any of this was written by someone other than yourself, or if you wrote it based on other sources, then those sources must be properly credited. You can find help on this topic in the articles on Reliable sources, Citing sources, and Footnotes. And feel free to ask questions. Regards --ShelfSkewed talk 02:45, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply