Kaomso

Hi Kaomso, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of Contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
• Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

• Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
• The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

• Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
• If you'd like to tell us about yourself and meet other new users, be sure to introduce yourself at our new user log.

Good luck, and have fun. --Smart_Viral ^(talk) 02:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: iBrator and the iMac

Re your message: You are welcome to recreate it, but without any resulting information on the iMac page about what the redirect references, it is not a helpful redirect. Looking at the references you listed, it seems to be a non-notable product that made no lasting impact and a few web videos that likewise were not notable. -- Gogo Dodo 05:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on your Talk page. Kaomso 22:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Re your message: Here are the three references that you listed: [1] [2] [3]. -- Gogo Dodo 18:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

iMac template

I never said this was about education iMacs; yet the 17" model is still "in production", albeit for education purposes.

Whenever a screen size is dropped, the next screen size takes its place in Apple's lineup, assorting it by positioning as opposed to screen size makes more sense IMO and keeps the timeline at a smaller size. Butterfly0fdoom 18:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The template has been protected. You need to talk it out on the talk page. And you need to understand how Wikipedia works. Whereas I don't agree with assorting the iMacs by screen size (I feel using price point makes the template cleaner and less cumbersome), I have compromised my stance on that. And you need to make compromises as well. You need to understand that editing Wikipedia isn't about adjusting the article to what YOU think is right, it's about creating something that's acceptable by the community and consistent with the rest of Wikipedia. Your mis-citation of WP:Crystal Ball and your habit of avoid talk pages demonstrates that you have a sore misconception of how Wikipedia works. Butterfly0fdoom (talk) 21:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I've joined the discussion here. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 04:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Just informing you that the neutral party that I put in a request for has made his decision. Please read over the discussion and give your final input. Butterfly0fdoom (talk) 22:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

1. Did you not read the edit history? Do not revert (that implies taking any edit action, as well) and DISCUSS ON TALK PAGE. 2. The neutral party did not explictly state approval of your proposal. Your lack of comment was interpreted by I myself as an abandonment of the argument and therefore you conceding, and the admin monitoring that article agreed with my assessment. Butterfly0fdoom (talk) 04:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

iMac timeline

Just to inform you, with the current revision of the iMac, the Core 2 Extreme option no longer exists, thus making any argument for the inclusion of Core 2 Extreme now moot. May we please come to a consensus in regards to how to address the timeline now? Butterfly0fdoom (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Updated. Kaomso (talk) 00:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)