I've responded to your concerns here [[1]]. Thanks. Authentickle (talk) 16:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


Revert edit

Hey Traxs. Thanks for the policing, but clearly this article has been subject to a quality issue. Edits have been made that are slightly non-neutral . A suggestion is to revert to the state on 13:54, 11 May 2010. Another suggestion is to create a separate "Criticisms' section for people to vent out their anger. however, will take that up in a discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanishkajoshi (talk • contribs)

Hi Kanishkajoshi. Which article are you talking about? Thanks Traxs7 02:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chitpavan


I just added a flag for someone to take a look at the neutrality of the article. Also if you want you can, create a criticisms section on the talk page to discuss the issues with the POV.

I also just noticed that an admin has protected the page. Traxs7 02:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:45, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Reply