April 2016

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kaley Marie. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Don't remove the AfD tag young lady, I don't want to see you have to be blocked. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Growing tired of the bullshit day by day. 07:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Kaley Marie, you may be blocked from editing. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Growing tired of the bullshit day by day. 07:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaleyaldrich, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Growing tired of the bullshit day by day. 07:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Kaley...

edit

This is how we do things at Wikipedia. Not by maliciously removing templates or making sockpuppets (which you appear to have done, but I'll leave that to the CheckUsers to decide and will publicly apologize if I am wrong). You are a new user, and part of me does not want to see you have to be blocked, but you must listen when someone is telling you that you are doing things wrong. Okay? PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Growing tired of the bullshit day by day. 08:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaleyaldrich, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 04:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)Reply