November 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abu Hurairah has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Hurairah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yinf (talk) 13:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Hurairah, you may be blocked from editing. Yinf (talk) 13:15, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KalbolHosain (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

hello, first thanks to call me a vandal! . I'm just typing to say I have reasons for all of my claims. I forgotted to add source and reference for them. for example abu hurairah is a liar that changed or created! Hadith and I can address this from Sunni and Shia books. you called me vandal , but what about that person who claimed abu hurairah(God damn him!) has said right stuff...

Decline reason:

The claims that you were making in the article require multiple reliable sources due to the nature of the claims. You cannot make unsupported claims that somebody is a liar. Finally, adding the text "God damn him!" after a person's name is almost never appropriate in an article. Please review WP:Reliable sources and explain how, if you're allowed to edit further, your future edits will comply with this policy. —C.Fred (talk) 16:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.