Welcome!

Hello, Kacper95, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Marta gut, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Scjessey (talk) 00:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Marta gut

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Marta gut requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Scjessey (talk) 00:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The amazing race 17

edit
 

The article The amazing race 17 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL. They're on season 15 now.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 04:35, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of The amazing race 17

edit

I have nominated The amazing race 17, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The amazing race 17. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 13:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The amazing race 17

edit
 

A tag has been placed on The amazing race 17 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 07:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

August 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Big Brother 7 (U.S.), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 04:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Amazing Race 17, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Amazing Race 17 was changed by Kacper95 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858804 on 2010-11-19T01:15:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:15, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

TAR17

edit

Do not add the results of an episode before it is known to air in any market. The 9th episode has not even aired yet, so we do not know how you could have possibly found out the results.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:47, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

In fact, why did you add the results for three episodes in advance?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:57, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cuz i saw on the RFF and they have all the elimination all the way through the finale :P

RFF is not allowed as a source for Wikipedia.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:35, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

TAR18

edit

Do not add a results table to The Amazing Race 18 because there is no confirmation on the full cast. RFF is not a reliable source.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I gave other sources too.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kacper95 (talkcontribs)
They still all go back to RFF. When CBS says who is racing, Wikipedia can say who is racing.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. John Vandenberg (chat) 12:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply


Hello? Is anyone on? Ok, I have been blocked a long time ago can you unblock me now?