User talk:Kacart98/Transcendental Meditation

Peer Review

I like the original article and your suggested edits. I think it's important to include the most up to date research possible for a topic such as one as popular as this one. My only suggestion thus far would to revise your suggested edit to say something along the lines of, "A recent study performed on such and such date, 2021...." and then provide the findings. I think that would possibly flow better than "A recent 2021 study..." Overall, nice edit and article selection.Rk052020 (talk) 12:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review

I read over your draft and I believe it was very well written and informative. In my peer review, I did say that the resources you used seemed to come one after another with little informative information in between. I still believe that all your information was included well in the draft but maybe could be written in a more fluent way to allow the reader to understand better. However, I still believe you have done a very good job. --T01H98 (talk) 04:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review

You have done a very nice job with a challenging article. Current or more recent research may be available to replace some of the more controversial information. While supporting a more neutral tone, this information could also help to clarify some of the more vague aspects of Transcendental meditation. M4c9s0 (talk) 01:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)