Be careful. Most guidelines on articles generally show that only one instance of wiki-linking is necessary, like in the case of the 60 degree v6.

If there's one link to a Citation, then there need not be any others.RCHM 22:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Chevrolet sub-compacts edit

That's nice that your friend thinks that and all, but I hardly think Wikipedia would consider that a reliable source. I'm simply making a point that before you go ahead and start changing a major template, you bring the changes up and discuss it with all of the editors involved. Roguegeek (talk) 07:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Marbleworks edit

I'll withdraw the deletion request on Marbleworks for now, but please note that Wikipedia articles require some sources to support the article (see WP:RS, WP:V), which should demonstrate the popularity and notability of the topic (see WP:N). Please add the sources and importance material to the article as soon as possible, otherwise someone else may request a deletion. Dl2000 23:59, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kent Hovind edit

You need to cite sources regarding your proposed addition. Ursasapien (talk) 09:53, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Don't forget to sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end. This will magically put your signature and the date and time stamp when you save. The easiest way to cite is to use the <ref> </ref> tags. Try cutting and pasting the text below:

YouTube Banning Controversy edit

On September 10, 2007, a user called "RabidApe" was banned from YouTube. Creation Science Evangelism accused him of copyright violation for using clips from Kent Hovind's video series. Many other users doing the same thing were banned, including users posting Kent Hovind's calls from jail.

The response has been almost universally negative. Opposers of this act cite Kent Hovind's statement that works produced by Creation Science Evangelism are not copyrighted and the fact that only opposing videos are flagged for removal. [1]

Best of luck, Ursasapien (talk) 10:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

That is a forum, not a WP:RS. Do you have any other sources? KillerChihuahua?!? 10:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Marbleworks edit

 

I have nominated Marbleworks, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marbleworks. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TravellingCari 15:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Spider photo you submitted to the Tegenaria domestica page is not actually that species edit

Hi, I'm an araneologist and wandered onto the wiki page for Tegenaria domestica tonight because I was going to share the link with someone who had found one. I stopped in my tracks when I saw that none of the four images on that page are actually the correct spider. Needless to say, I'm now on a "mission" to help correct this. I attempted to contact the other 3 users as well but one was retired, one didn't have a talk page, and the other one I'm not sure yet. I tried to read through and understand the process of proposing an image be deleted or moved although I still don't "get it," but it did recommend that I contact the user who submitted the image first and see if they could do it without having to propose anything. Thanks! P.S. I just (as in tonight) opened an account here and if this is the wrong way to contact users, I truly apologize. Let me know if there is a better/recommended way. --Lady Arachnophile (talk) 12:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ "Rational Response Squad Alerts". Rational Responders.com. Retrieved 2007-09-12.