With regard to some of your recent edits [[1]], please take some time to read Wikipedia ground rules. WP is not a soapbox or place to advertise books, seminars or healing ministries. Cheers MatthewTStone (talk) 05:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2009

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Inner Healing Movement. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ベリット 話せます 02:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Inner Healing and Deliverance

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Inner Healing and Deliverance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dori ❦ (TalkContribsReview) ❦ 04:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Time to declare your conflict of interest

edit

I put it to you that you are in fact Stephen Fredericks, the author of the book "Loosing The Key of David: A Field Guide to Inner Healing & Deliverance", or someone acting on the author's behalf. Judging by your edits to date, you have a vested interest in promoting your book on Wikipedia. True or false? MatthewTStone (talk) 22:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply