Speedy deletion nomination of Royal v St. John's

edit

Hello KKKTT21dF,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Royal v St. John's for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 09:23, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

August 2013

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. Go back to your original account and request an unblock there. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Qwyrxian (talk) 14:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply