Billie Rowan

edit

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Billie Rowan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rossheth | Talk to me 19:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Billie Rowan

edit

I've nominated Billie Rowan, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Billie Rowan satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billie Rowan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Billie Rowan during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rossheth | Talk to me 11:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Additions to Sally Armstrong and Kelly Woods

edit

Hi! Could you please cite the sources that support your additions to the Sally Armstrong article. I've added a template to the article to give you some time but if there are no sources then that information will need to be removed for now.

Also I was unable to find any sources for the article Kelly Woods. Could you please also cite your sources that support the information in that article.

Thanks =) SM&Co. 12:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

July 2007

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to The Bill, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kurt Shaped Box 18:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mia Perry, you will be blocked from editing. Kurt Shaped Box 20:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --VS talk 15:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Daniel Case 19:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Harry (The Bill)

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Harry (The Bill), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hunting dog (talk) 20:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Rachel Inns" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Rachel Inns has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 § Rachel Inns until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply