Red Aces

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Red Aces, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/7279/redaces.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Red Aces

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Red Aces requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ElderGods (talk) 06:12, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

hello!

edit

Please don't remove the tags that are on the articles... --ElderGods (talk) 06:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Xinsrc 35202032413339532603224.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Pic01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Sources

edit

Hi, please make sure you supply a source when you make changes to statistics. Thanks! Sbw01f (talk) 07:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lake View Academy

edit
 

The article Lake View Academy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

When I did a Google search of this I found no third-party references to prove notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Catfurball (talk) 21:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply