Speedy deletion of Xoticpc

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Xoticpc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 17:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Xoticpc

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Xoticpc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your message on my talk page - I assume that you posted it, but you did forget to sign it! I have nominated Xoticpc for deletion because it reads like an advertisement. --ukexpat (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have added back the db tag -- please do not delete it - the hangon tag should be placed after the db tag to contest the deletion, the db tag must not be deleted. Thanks.--ukexpat (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2008

edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Xoticpc. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Xoticpc

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Xoticpc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply