Perverted Justice wiki proposed changes. These changes attempt to leave the article as is as much as possible and only adds clarifying information.
Overview
Von Erck is also credited with locating a 14-year-old girl who was allegedly kidnapped, raped, and tortured by a 47-year-old man she met online. However, the jury acquitted the accused of the kidnapping and child rape counts, and of twenty-three counts of possession of depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct with sexual motivation. [1] The remaining eight counts of sexual exploitation of a minor were reversed on appeal. [2]
Kruska
On January 10, 2008, a multi-count pro se (self represented) civil lawsuit was filed in the District Court of Arizona by Jan Kruska, who seeks change in current sex offender laws. Kruska is suing the group and a number of others, including Myspace and Godaddy.com, claiming defamation, cyber-stalking and cyber-harassment after she was added to the Wikisposure site. Only the suit against Perverted Justice is still pending. [3]
Notable incidents
Change this "She had met her 47-year-old kidnapper in a chat room. He was subsequently charged with child rape and unlawful imprisonment."
To this "She had met the 47-year-old man through a profile she had on an adult BDSM site where she claimed to be 19." [2]
(The disposition of the trial is already explained above and this version clarifies it wasn't your typical chat room.)
References
Does the above fairly represent the facts per the court opinion? Does the new Kruska link justify the addition of this new sentence? "Only the suit against Perverted Justice is still pending." I tried to be fair and accurate. Is it true to the appellate opinion and the Kruska link?