Request for mediation rejected

edit
The request for formal mediation concerning Bhagat Singh, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

January 2015

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bhagat Singh has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

February 2015

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bhagat Singh. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN talk to me 14:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

What constitutes unsourced content please?
The issue in question (Sikh vs atheist) has been discussed to death on the article talk page. If you persist in disrupting the process of consensus as you have been doing then the only outcome will be an enforcement of sanctions as notified below. Please be careful. - Sitush (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
This issue has been discussed but NOT resolved. I have presented evidences to make the article in question accurate but this is being dismissed without proper grounds. The evidences I have presented has greater gravitas than the one piece of uncorroborated evidence that it refutes. I have made a number of presentations to answer queries raised and I have been met with abuse, threats and irrational counter arguments. I don't mean to disrupt the process and indeed I have tred to engage the processes to resolve this to no success. My main objective is to ensure this article is accurate and subverted and I will continue to do this. As always I am open to rationale debate.


  The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

March 2015

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bhagat Singh. Abecedare (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Reply