Hello welcome to my new talk page.

Speedy deletion nomination of General Warhawk

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on General Warhawk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logan Talk Contributions 22:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Johnny Glea

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WuhWuzDat 01:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jrfk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry that my friend made sock puppets. I was helping and I got blocked. I think that this account block is no longer neccessary. I promise to not make the same mistake my friend did, I promise, No more accounts will be made from this IP address. and if there are, there not me. You should be able to tell. I will make only helpful edits and articles. I promise. These are my words. I would say them to you if you were my dad. This is the truth. I'm sorry, and this will end. I know your more mad than me and want to get over it. So let's make a deal like my friend did. If you unblock me, I will make sure you will never need to block me again. I understand why I'm blocked, for making articles of real people and sock puppets with my friends, but they're gone for good, and I will no longer be the "Funny Guy" like I was before with my friends. I'm now mature. I would really apperacaite it if you'd unblock me. I promise you won't regret unblocking me. I cross my heart and hope to die that's the truth.

Decline reason:

You must request unblock through your primary account.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jrfk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm going to leave, forever, just as Justin did. I can't be trusted I'll leave forever and never, ever, come back. Justin did that. You forced it on Joe, but I will leave and I'm honest. No need to revoke this talk page's editing priviliges, I jusr came at the wrong time. But you don't want me to be here like Justin and Joe were, I'll leave. I've got a life. I'm mad at Justin for giving me passwords to blocked accouts. So I'll leave for good just like Justin did. How does that sound? Happy? Even if you revoke me, I be gone by the time you do it. So I'll leave. And this time no one will carry my legacy. I'm gone, Justin's gone and so is Joe, so I'll leave after you answer this. Also look up on Google, New Stars in Ma.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jrfk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand now. I will only help Wikipedia from now on. I will make sure this never happems again. I understand why I was blocked. It'll never happen again. The block is no longer nesscissary because I know why I'm blocked. I will make no more accounts.

Decline reason:

Copy and paste is not enough: you need to address the block reason and convince us. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.  Sandstein  19:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jrfk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What should I do? What do you suggest? I will accept, because I want to get out of what my friend did. And if I came at the wrong time, then when would you trust me to edit pages. Please tell me what I should do and I'll do it. I am not Justin, but if you don't believe me, then should I leave or is there away to seperate me from the sock? If you want me gone, then I'll leave. Good bye.

Decline reason:

As told many times before, please leave. –MuZemike 07:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Plus one more thing, was does indifinite mean? When is indifinite? Does it mean forever? What should I do to get an expiration date or end this gaint block?
Please tell me what it means.
Wikipedia is a major encyclopedia, maybe the most widely-read one in the world. You are applying for a job- a volunteer job, but still a job- writing for a publication that might have even more readers than the Harry Potter books. You are indefinitely blocked because you appear to be someone who has disrupted that publication in the past. 'Indefinite' means that the block does not expire, but stays in place until an administrator becomes convinced that having you as a participant would make the encyclopedia better. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jrfk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I do try to help, it's just you change it all back. I'm trying to help. All I ask is to be unblock. I've tried to impress you people but it doesn't work. Please help me. If you unblock me, I will dedicate my life to wikipedia. I promise I'll make helpful edits. I'm sorry. And It'll never, ever happen again.

Decline reason:

Creating additional sock puppets to evade block is not impressing us one bit. Talk page revoked. As I said above, please leave. –MuZemike 07:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.