30 Rock (season 4)

edit

  Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Theleftorium 12:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Changing sourced infomation

edit

Please stop changing the episode title at List of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia episodes, the source states the title is "Mac and Charlie: White Trash" not "Charlie and Mac: White Trash". Xeworlebi (talk) 17:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from $h*! My Dad Says. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Xeworlebi (talk) 20:30, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to A Thousand Suns. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 23:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A Thousand Suns, you may be blocked from editing. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 01:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A Thousand Suns, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Friginator (talk) 04:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A Thousand Suns, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 19:44, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 00:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerenetalk 09:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Now archived to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive643#User:Josegmol. --George2001hi 16:06, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to A Thousand Suns, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 18:17, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at A Thousand Suns. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 16:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Is there a reason that you continue to push against established consensus, even after being blocked for a week for your actions, without providing any edit summaries or contributing to the conversation on the talk page what-so-ever? These actions are highly disruptive, and, though it may be seen by some as uncivil for me to say this, these activities have had the attributes of being nothing more than "Point of View" pushing. Please, at bare minimal, provide an explanation for your actions and/or cease them. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 17:06, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
And, I might add, you could easily be blocked again, possibly permanently this time, if you continue. Some admins would have blocked you already for continuing this. Friginator (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're Getting Old

edit

  Hi. Please do not add unsourced material or original research to articles, as you did with this edit to You're Getting Old, as this violates Wikipedia's policies of No Original Research and Verifiability. Unsourced personal observations on pop culture references are not permitted, as any material on the episode's content must be supported by reliable secondary sources that explicitly mention the episode's use of it. This type of material was already removed from the article yesterday for this reason.

In addition, spaces need to go in between words, and second-person pronouns such as "you" are not used in the formal tone of an encyclopedia, except in special cases, such as a direct quote. Make sure you use the Preview function to see how you edits look before saving them. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 20:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply