March 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Add92. I noticed that you recently removed some content from John Devine (footballer born 1958)‎ without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Add92 (talk) 22:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John Devine (footballer born 1958)‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Add92 (talk) 22:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to John Devine (footballer born 1958). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Add92 (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at John Devine (footballer born 1958), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Add92 (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at John Devine (footballer born 1958). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Darkwind (talk) 23:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply