This is a new type of application server, a new invention! The only thing that one could possibly consider SPAM, is the External Links otherwise there is NO reference to a company name or a product name. The generic name *is* POJO Application Server, and these terms can be found on the wiki already. POJO Application Server

As for the External Links referencing a site with an actual product name Harbor... that is the non commercial site (the inventors) site that promotes the new technology. Currently it is the only site, however as more companies adopt the invention, there will no doubt be more.

If this is considered spam then definitions like Glassfish_Application_Server must be torn down immediately, that clearly is a brand name for a specific company, as is JBOSS these are clearly commercial products with a very definite brand name.

If one can be a little more specific: what exactly is the SPAM, and why is this even close to BRAND NAMES appearing in these other products.

One can understand that this new technology is a threat to the above brands advertising here in the WIKI, however POJO Application Server is a generic techology and a methodoly, not a product, and even though it may scare the big brand names using the older IOC technology, trying to brand this as SPAM, is nothing more than a terrified knee jerk response.

Naturally the inventor is proud of the invention, and for people to experience this remarkable technology... there has to be a reference implementation in the links.

Please be more specific, and if the format is not up to scratch, please assist in fixing that

Thank You




POJO Application Server

edit

A tag has been placed on POJO Application Server, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 12:15, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of POJO Application Server

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, POJO Application Server, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POJO Application Server. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eastmain (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply