JohnnyB256

Rollbacker

P.S.: I gave you rollbacker rights--hope it makes your life easier by a couple of mouse-clicks... Owen× ☎ 13:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks much. Whoa! That's a powerful tool. I better learn how to use it.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 14:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Re:Huggle

Hello, JohnnyB256. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, JohnnyB256. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
Message added 01:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Award

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For beating me to reverts and beating me again. And again. And... you get the point.fetch comms 21:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Lucky. I need more edits for rollbacking.--fetch comms 21:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, that's technology... *sighs*....rp--fetch comms 21:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Haha, yeah. But the weirdest thing I've seen was a userpage with "Free Accutane here" and a link to a Canadian online pharmacy. Immediate G11.--fetch comms 00:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Hahaha!... I never see any of that... all I get to see is stupid people. Some absolute idiot spelled spelled penis penus. It was so hilarious, I almost forgot to revert it.--fetch comms 00:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! That is sooooo... wow. I wish I could revert vandals like that:(--fetch comms 00:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

hehehe...--fetch comms 00:40, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for putting in the link to Hasans' 2007 Presentation. Probably more related to Hasans' 'bigraphy' page, but as I and apprently you weren't much in favour of that at this stage, they can find it themselves. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 01:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, JohnnyB256. You have new messages at 220.101.28.25's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mass deletions

Take a look at User:Qworty, he's pretty much edit warring in the name of BLP (can be deleted immediately without discussion) by deleting any connection between the fort hood shooter, the Dar al-Hijrah mosque, intercepts of communications, Anwar al-Awlaki, etc across many articles. Any attempt to restore these are immediately reverted under the same justification. Seeing how some people are confronted, threatened and banned within 24 hours for infractions as minori as using Fox News as a source in violation of BLP, isn't this the sort of guy you could characterize as having a negative effect on the WP if you can't even state Hasan's attending the mosque, or being under investigation by the FBI? Nothing indicates that anybody has confronted this guy. Would this be worth having an administrator look at it? Bachcell (talk) 21:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

(rv guilt by association; blatant BLP violation) Hasan had attended the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, in 2001, at the same time as Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour, two of the September 11 hijackers. However, it is not known if Hasan ever encountered them. of individuals belonging to or associated with al-Qaeda.

Revision as of 06:22, 11 November 2009 (edit) (undo) Qworty (talk | contribs) (→Religious and ideological beliefs: all of this is a BLP violation, guilt by assocition) Next edit →

Hasan had attended the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, in 2001. Anwar al-Awlaki an American-born scholar now living in Yemen was the imam there in 2001. The imam was a spiritual adviser to the hijackers, and Hasan has been reported to have deep respect for al-Awlaki's teachings. Awlaki has been called "one of the principal jihadi luminaries for would-be homegrown terrorists," and Awlaki's lecture on "Constants on the Path of Jihad" is similar to an Al Qaeda document, and is a "bible for lone-wolf Muslim extremists." After the attack, Awlaki praised Hasan for the shooting; on his personal website, he encouraged other Muslims serving in the military to "follow in the footsteps of men like Nidal." Awlaki teaches at Iman University headed by Abdul Majeed al-Zindani who has been designated "Specially Designated Global Terrorist" by the US Treasury Department. Zindani also appears on the UN 1267 Committee's list of individuals belonging to or associated with al-Qaeda.

Revision as of 06:23, 11 November 2009 (edit) (undo) Qworty (talk | contribs) (→Religious and ideological beliefs: BLP violation) Next edit

- ABC News has reported that U.S. officials were aware that Hasan had attempted to contact Al Qaeda. Also according to ABC News Hasan had "more unexplained connections to people being tracked by the FBI" than just radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki.

Revision as of 06:32, 11 November 2009 (edit) (undo) Qworty (talk | contribs) (→Background: "Background"?! This is a BLP violation and nothing more than guilt by association) Next edit →

Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who is currently the sole suspect in the November 5, 2009 Fort Hood shootings, attended the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in 2001, at the same time as Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour, two of the September 11 hijackers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abdul_Majeed_al-Zindani&diff=prev&oldid=325200804

Revision as of 06:39, 11 November 2009 (edit) (undo) Qworty (talk | contribs) (rv BLP violation--guilt by association) Next edit →

and party leader Jarallah Omar. Anwar al-Awlaki, who was later an imam to Fort Hood shooting suspect Nidal Malik Hasan, served

Revision as of 06:41, 11 November 2009 (edit) (undo) Qworty (talk | contribs) (rv BLP violation--guilt by association) Next edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anwar_al-Awlaki&diff=prev&oldid=325201008

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nidal_Malik_Hasan&diff=prev&oldid=325201626

Revision as of 19:25, 11 November 2009 (edit) (undo) Qworty (talk | contribs) (→Religious and ideological beliefs: nothing more than speculation and guilt by association, BLP) Next edit →

• Even should he be acquitted or not charged with anything, he would be notable for having received massive media coverage as the prime suspect in the case. Conviction of a crime is not a factor in our inclusion criteria for biographies. We do have articles about people other than convicted criminals, you know.  Sandstein  06:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

+

• Mass media coverage does not cancel out the BLP guidelines. The media doesn't run Wikipedia. We have policies and guidelines here, unlike the media. Qworty (talk) 06:47, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nidal_Malik_Hasan&diff=prev&oldid=325293687

Hasan had attended the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, in 2001, at the same time as two of the September 11 hijackers, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour, and about the same time as Ahmed Omar Abu Ali, who was convicted of providing material support to al Qaeda and conspiracy to assassinate President George W. Bush. However, it is not known if Hasan ever encountered them.

Revision as of 19:26, 11 November 2009 (edit) (undo) Qworty (talk | contribs) (→Religious and ideological beliefs: guilt by association; wild theorizing; BLP violation) Next edit →

- Anwar al-Awlaki, now in hiding in Yemen, was the imam at the mosque in 2001, while a third hijacker attended his services while in California. Al-Awlaki had issued a statement in support of the shootings. The imam was a spiritual adviser to the hijackers, and Hasan has been reported to have deep respect for al-Awlaki's teachings. - - After the attack, Awlaki praised Hasan for the shooting; on his personal website, he encouraged other Muslims serving in the military to "follow in the footsteps of men like Nidal." Hasan sent emails to people associated with Al Qaeda, two U.S. officials said.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dar_al-Hijrah&diff=prev&oldid=325295062

Revision as of 19:32, 11 November 2009 (edit) (undo) Qworty (talk | contribs) (→Background: These "associations" are pure speculation, nothing more, and guilt by association. They have no place here.) Next edit → Major Nidal Malik Hasan, currently the sole suspect in the November 5, 2009, Fort Hood shootings, attended the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in 2001, at the same time as Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour, two of the September 11 hijackers. Ahmed Omar Abu Ali, who was convicted of providing material support to al Qaeda and conspiracy to assassinate President George W. Bush, also prayed at the mosque around that time,

Om nom nom.

Cheers – you beat me to it. Fribbulus Xax (talk) 23:05, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

same from me!. Thanks. GDallimore (Talk) 21:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Vandals

Hehe, no. Only the post office and stuff... But I do need Huggle! It never ends :(-- fetch comms ☛ 03:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, JohnnyB256. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

and another! HJMitchell You rang? 22:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

and another! HJMitchell You rang? 22:31, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

one more. HJMitchell You rang? 15:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

you have mail! HJMitchell You rang? 16:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, JohnnyB256. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

al Queda

It's looking like the whole fort hood thing was organized by Al Queda in Iraq people. Who do you think should look into if any of the people on WP are coming in from Yemen?? You might be good in helping put information in the the Al Queda article which doesn't mention much of any of the AQ links published so far by the RS Bachcell (talk) 15:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

See the huge ft Hood section that was removed from Al-Qaeda. Most of what grsz11 does troubles me. Bachcell (talk) 01:42, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism

Np, I think these. :P-- fetch comms ☛ 00:04, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Yep! Been rollbacking for a while, and its fun!-- fetch comms ☛ 00:14, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Even funnier is those that bother to make an account and then get blocked in less time than it took to make it!-- fetch comms ☛ 00:21, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

No problem, of course. Vandals can always... well, I shouldn't really say it :)-- fetch comms ☛ 04:13, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

aPoLoGiZm 2.0

DUDE BRAH! I's mega srry bout wUT I did DoNE. i IS PROmisizing that IT willnt BE HaPPeninininin agun. PEESE! --Me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omegaslime (talk • contribs)

November 2009

I noticed the message you recently left to User talk:LandonMcCullough. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 19:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

I removed the final warning msg. as overkill, as I think I may have misinterpreted his post on the page as vandalism when it was not. I think the others were justified - he was writing in the first person in the article, as I recall - so I left them, but I'm not 100% sure as the article is deleted and so are the diffs. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 01:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Good deal. Thanks for reconsidering. I agree that something was amiss, it was just the final warning for vandalism that seemed a bit too much for me. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 01:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, the final warning was too much under the circumstances, definitely.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Reversions

[1] [2] Any topic considered notable enough for Wikipedia is notable enough for inclusion on the date events' pages. I believe the removal of wikilinks as benign as these is probably vandalism. Cla68 (talk) 09:03, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

If we had an article titled Notice by Robertson of intent to BusinessWeek then that argument might be arguable. But we don't have an article on that event. Nor do we have an article on the Out-of-court settled of Robertson v. McGraw-Hill Co., Weiss, and Shepard. Even if the individual events were notable, that is not sufficient to merit a slot in a very short list.   Will Beback  talk  09:51, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

I would also caution Cla68 not to throw around terms like "vandalism." When text is removed in good faith, it is not vandalism, and in this case it appears that two other editors have reached the same conclusion. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 14:05, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

Blocked per private evidence. Please email the Arbitration committee or any arbitrator. Thatcher 03:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately you do not have email enabled so I can not contact you privately. Feel free to email me if you wish instead of Arbcom, although I will be cc'ing Arbcom on any discussion. Thatcher 03:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

If this account is a sock of another, banned account, could someone please add the appropriate, identifying tag? Cla68 (talk) 05:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Pretzel twist

I had some pressing pretzel-related issues to discuss with you but it looks like you're banned. So nevermind. --Larry Bergman (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

So I got to spar with an infamous Wikipedia scoundrel that once called himself "Mantanmoreland". So will his edits on Naked Short Selling be stricken as well since he is a banned "sock puppet"? Cookiehead (talk) 02:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Claudia Lynx

Hello JohnnyB256, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Claudia Lynx, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Kmehrabi. This has been done because the page is a blatant advert that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Kmehrabi. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Kmehrabi (talk · contribs) 18:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sam Yasgur at Woodstock.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sam Yasgur at Woodstock.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:John Pattison.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:John Pattison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)