COI edit

Hi John,

As part of my general desire to dot i's and cross t's I've opened this thread - I'm sure it will be fine. I would say in passing that all the COI board is really empowered to do is put a small templated on the articles in question - so if there is some COI you have lurking around - then do mention it (via email if privacy is a convern and we'll be able to close the thread quickly. Fayedizard (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up, Fayedizard. I've posted a response on the COI with my disclosure (minor as it is), and I hope this will put the matter to rest. I welcome the examination, though preferably by neutral, proven editors such as yourself and not the swarm of vengeful SPA meatpuppets that characterized the discussion on the Douglas Anthony Cooper page. Since the subject of that page has embarked on a campaign of harassment and misinformation against Wikipedia and against me personally, and has a blog on Huffington Post Canada putting his own political distortions on the issue, ballot-stuffing is a real concern. -- JohnDopp (talk) 23:09, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Humane edit

Thanks, is it worth moving him over to the proper article?--Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I don't see why not, it's useful information that could be expanded on in the future. JohnDopp (talk) 23:14, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply