Joee2012

DR/N

The DR/N filing you have made does not have enough information to proceed. What is the exact issue you are raising? If this is a conduct issue involving a perception of "editorial control" this may not be the proper venue and may need to be taken to an administrative board as an ownership issue. Please elaborate or consider withdrawing this filing. I would note that the amount of editors you have listed is very unusual when looking at the talkpage. Please limit participants to only those involved directly as edit summaries and editing alone is not considered "discussion".--Amadscientist (talk) 08:43, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Should there be no reply here or at the DR/N talkpage within a reasonable amount of time, this filing may be closed as the wrong venue.--Amadscientist (talk) 09:05, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Joe, I've responded to your comment on the article talk page. I moved it to the very bottom of the page in its own new section, because I'm afraid it would be overlooked just being in the middle of another discussion. Let me know if you have any questions. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:48, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Because you made a single comment as an IP and no reply was made to it, another volunteer has closed the filing as not having extensive discussion. Please use the talkpage to collaborate on a consensus with involved editors.--Amadscientist (talk) 21:36, 12 October 2012 (UTC)