JobeHinnid

Is it not against Wiki rules to write a description (this whole page in fact) that mocks a person's opinions and beliefs? Throughout this routing I feel like it's the same person who has authored nearly the entire thing. I would propose an entirely re-written and unbiased account. Just simply state the guys information, period end of story. Let the people decide if they want to pursue researching him further. The truth now is that since alot of this stuff was recorded here, he has been vindicated in many ways. The 'promising stuff' was of course what I was adding as new, unbiased, and original content. I will attempt to add that stuff again now and leave all the 'conspiracy bashing' for another day. --JobeHinnid (talk) 04:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Bearden edits

I misspoke when I removed your contributions. The Bedini stuff was off topic, the reference to the Free Energy Series was simply too long and read like a commercial. Put it back if you want, but please keep it to a reasonable length. For the record, this article has been edited by many people, it's simply that Bearden's stuff doesn't work, and his "explanations" are meaninless drivel.Prebys (talk) 19:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)