Jmans25

BACK TO XP.jpg

Hello Jmans25, thank you for adding your image BACK TO XP.jpg to the article Downgrade. However, in accordance with Wikipedia:Image_use_policy, your image is not suitable for this article, because of violations of image appropriateness (Wikipedia:Choosing_appropriate_illustrations). As such, your edits to the page have been reverted. Please review Wikipedia's image policies before submitting any images. Thank you. Soggybread (talk) 10:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Office Assistant, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Office Assistant was changed by Jmans25 (u) (t) making a minor change censoring content (Wikipedia is not censored) on 2009-12-03T21:17:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Your WP:FFU request

Hello, and thank you for your request! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main Files for Upload page. This request will be archived after seven days. Regards, Slon02 (talk) 02:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your request! I've looked over your request and left a comment. Please check the comment and respond at your request on the main Files for Upload page (not here). Your request will stay there for seven days and then it will be archived. Regards, Slon02 (talk) 05:04, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Camolist

A tag has been placed on Camolist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 04:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hugedrive

A tag has been placed on Hugedrive requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kimon^talk 07:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Hugedrive article

Hi. I've moved your article to User:Jmans25/Hugedrive for you to develop. To establish this product's notability, you'll need to provide multiple, substantial third-party references. You can find out more at WP:N and can ask questions at its talk page. All the best, Bettia (talk) 08:59, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Categories

I have modified the category link in the above page (see here), so it is no longer in the category where it does not belong (and it does not belong to the main article space category as long as it is not a main space article).

I also nominated the User:Jmans25/new article name here for speedy deletion (see below) because it simply duplicates the User:Jmans25/Hugedrive and is not linked from any other Wikipedia page (and also due to its poorly chosen name). --CiaPan (talk) 13:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jmans25/new article name here

A tag has been placed on User:Jmans25/new article name here, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it duplicates User:Jmans25/Hugedrive, it has irrelevant name and it is not linked from any other page in Wikipedia

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:User:Jmans25/new article name here|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CiaPan (talk) 13:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Blackberry torch.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blackberry torch.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 20:19, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Blackberry torch.png

Thanks for uploading File:Blackberry torch.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 00:42, 30 October 2010 (UTC)