Speedy deletion of "Global Sources Home Products" edit

 

A page you created, Global Sources Home Products, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is recreation of content previously deleted following a deletion discussion.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  ŦħęGɛя㎥ 02:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Your possible conflict of interest edit

  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Global Sources Home Products, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Pegasus «C¦ 02:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of "Global Sources Baby & Children's Products" edit

 

A page you created, Global Sources Baby & Children's Products, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is recreation of content previously deleted following a deletion discussion.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  ŦħęGɛя㎥ 02:44, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of "Global Sources Fashion Accessories" edit

 

A page you created, Global Sources Fashion Accessories, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is recreation of content previously deleted following a deletion discussion.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ŦħęGɛя㎥ 03:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2008 edit

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Global Sources Fashion Accessories. ŦħęGɛя㎥ 03:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Block edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for creating multiple copies of the same page, which seems to be advertising. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 04:39, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Spam in Global Sources Magazines edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Global Sources Magazines, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Global Sources Magazines is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Global Sources Magazines, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:APACOV.GIF edit

Thanks for uploading Image:APACOV.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:BCPCOV.GIF edit

Thanks for uploading Image:BCPCOV.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:CPCOV.GIF edit

Thanks for uploading Image:CPCOV.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 02:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:ECCOV.GIF edit

Thanks for uploading Image:ECCOV.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:FACOV.GIF edit

Thanks for uploading Image:FACOV.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 02:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your uploads edit

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 02:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:GATCOV.GIF edit

Thanks for uploading Image:GATCOV.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:GPCOV.GIF edit

Thanks for uploading Image:GPCOV.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:HPCOV.GIF edit

Thanks for uploading Image:HPCOV.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image uploads edit

Hi, the images you uploaded today were clearly not your own work, so once again I have deleted them as a blatant copyright violation. Please do not re-upload these images unless you intend to make a valid claim of fair use. Fair use would likely only cover a single example image. Kevin (talk) 03:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, what you've uploaded is exactly what was needed. Kevin (talk) 05:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:Anema sample panels LR.gif edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Anema sample panels LR.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Asher196 (talk) 03:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fixed it. GreenReaper (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Spamming links to Anema edit

I recommend against linking the article you created on own work on every page where you can draw some reference between it and the article's topic. This is more than likely to draw attention to the lack of significant third-party coverage and your own involvement in the article's creation (see the COI message above from Pegasus). Also, redirecting generic terms like "Singapore manga" and "Fantasy comic" to the article is highly inappropriate - and again, is likely to draw the sort of attention that might get the article deleted. GreenReaper (talk) 06:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for going through this article.
The 2 articles referenced are NOT written by students from the university of the author. The university's website is the only place where these articles can still be seen from the web, thus the reference.
The claim that this webcomic won 3 "amateur web awards" is accurate, implying that the awards are not major and for amateur webmasters.
The subject of this article is one of the few original comic stories to have been published in singapore, and naturally should be found by anyone looking for 'singapore comics' or 'singapore manga'. The fact that there are no articles existing for these terms shows the drought of the subject matter.
Jkktay (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
The problem with such redirects is that they mislead the reader. They were looking for an article about such comics, not an example of one. There are also neutrality issues - why should it redirect to the article about your webcomic as opposed to someone else's?
If readers are searching for such things, then the article will come up in the search results once the index has updated - assuming those terms are included in the article and the article exists at the time of reindexing. Redirects should be used for other words or spellings which refer directly to the same topic, or from the name of a topic which is considered non-notable to a section of a more generic topic's article where the first topic is covered (e.g. if Comics in Singapore existed, and it had a section named Webcomics where Anema was mentioned, creating a redirect from the title Anema to Comics in Singapore#Webcomics would have been appropriate).
I'm still a little concerned that the article will fail WP:WEB and be deleted in the future. In case this happens - and because it's relevant to our topic - I've made a copy of this article at WikiFur (which doesn't have such notability requirements). GreenReaper (talk) 07:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

China Sourcing Fairs edit

Hi Jkktay. Thanks for leaving the message on my talk page. this account doesn't seem to have edited the China Sourcing Fairs article since I tagged it so I assume you made this edit under an IP account (which isn't a problem - I just want to make sure we're talking about the same thing). If so the changes to language you made were definitely an improvement. However the sources (which you content on my talk page are third party) do not actually verify the claims appropriately nor conform with our reliable sources guideline. The sources consist of a blog posting (rarely a reliable sources in any case) and two are press releases - which do not count as third party even if they are hosted by an external website. Independent third party sources are ones that can be expected to have applied a degree of rigorous critical thinking and investigation to their reporting - repetition of company claims and opinion pieces (except where significant opinions of the subject are what are being sourced and the opinion piece is by a significant commentator) do not do this. I'm going to add some fact tags to the article so you get an idea for some of the assertions that need verification from actual independent sources. I'll also add some notes on the article talk page. Hope this is useful. -- SiobhanHansa 08:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Trade Fairs edit

Hi again! Again assuming you are the IP editor as I assumed in the message above, I'm responding here to this message on my talk page. I didn't actually remove the edit - I changed it to focus on the one fair for which a source for the number of attendees had been provided (see my edit here). Attendances at the other fairs was not sourced and the the format - a whole host of separate fairs hosted by one company on one line, and the inclusion of non-citation external links - did not follow the standard used in the rest of the table. I have reverted your the re-addition. If there are good sources for attendance at the other fairs we should add them as separate entries, focusing on the individual fair - not the China Sourcing Fairs company. -- SiobhanHansa 08:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:CSF_HK_entrance.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CSF_HK_entrance.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 00:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:CSF_floor.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CSF_floor.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 00:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:CSF_top_view.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CSF_top_view.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 00:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Anema-ET.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Anema-ET.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:24, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Anema-poster.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Anema-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:13, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Anema-robots.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Anema-robots.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Anema sample panels LR.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Anema sample panels LR.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Anema-Leo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Anema-Leo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Seven Years in Dog-Land edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Seven Years in Dog-Land, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://dogland.smackjeeves.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Seven Years in Dog-Land edit

 

The article Seven Years in Dog-Land has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing but primary sources, no notability asserted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:53, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Article notability notification edit

  Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Anima: Age of the Robots, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Anima: Age of the Robots" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 15:28, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply