Jkatz55
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Suzette Field, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thelasttuesdaysociety.org/suzettefield.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 11:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
The article Suzette Field has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable person, does not meet WP:BIO. Unsourced apart from one in-passing mention in the Evening Standard (under "external links").
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 11:12, 25 May 2011 (UTC)