User talk:Jesus051/Sanumá language
Hey Jesus051! Great work on the article so far. I hope you've read my peer review already! Here are a few pointers as you keep writing. Whenever adding new information to the article ask yourself what is that information about. If you can answer that question in some form of "it is about the language" then add it, however if you answer something like "it is about the speakers of the language" think twice about whether you should add that info or not. Many languages have their own page separate from the page on its speakers because not all information is relevant to both subjects. Furthermore, as I said try to find more sources. The fastest way is to go to Glottlog. Even if you can't access something that is listed on there, you can find it somewhere else online, you just have to look. Best of luck! Let me know if you have any question about my peer review, I'll be happy to answer them. RussianAnt (talk) 17:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Final Review
editHi Jesus, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:
- Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
- Structure: For the most part the article is structured according to the suggested template. The "History and Society" section could be better named and organized. 4 points.
- Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
- Accuracy: It is difficult to gauge the accuracy of many claims, because they are not furnished with citations. The ones that are supported by references are generally high-quality. 4 points.
- Relevance: Nearly all of the information is relevant. 5 points.
- Length: Word count 1715/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 4 points.
The final score is 27/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 23:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)