Jejequeso

Spam in Penelopism

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Penelopism, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Penelopism is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Penelopism, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

wtf?

Why did you delete our Penelopism article? It's a blooming, new religion that is becoming more popular BY THE DAY. It's caused more controversy than anything I can think of. It's got hate sites, a SHOOTING GAME, and it's mentioned all over the place. So why? Did you even bother looking into the site? Or are you a christian bigot who won't see the light of day unless god is said to have made it happen? Republican.

And It DID have importance and significance. I don't see the problem. We didn't do anything. Someone just wrote an article about it in our school paper. So if it's big enough for THAT, why not wikipedia. Teachers already ban it for research projects. No one likes wikipedia. It's unreliable. So you can hardly consider yourself to have ANY authority over ANYTHING. So WHY NOT PENELOPISM?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jejequeso (talk • contribs) 22:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. In future, please sign your messages by typing ~~~~ at the end.

Penelopism was deleted by me and again later by Amire80. I deleted it because it fell under our criteria for speedy deletion, number 7 under Articles, i.e. it was an article about an organization or group of people which does not assert its notability or importance. If you disagree with the deletion, you are welcome to open a listing at Wikipedia:Deletion review.

If you can provide citations from reliable sources (a school paper is not a reliable source) that clearly establish that Penelopism is notable and meets the criteria for inclusion, you may recreate the article with those citations included.

Please read Wikipedia:Your first article for more information on how to create your first Wikipedia article. Please also read Wikipedia:Civility for details on the standard of polite interaction that is used on Wikipedia.

Your school paper probably does not have one of the top 10 most-visited sites in the world so it is unlikely that a subject which is "big enough" for it is implicitly includable on Wikipedia.

If you feel that nobody likes Wikipedia or that it is unreliable, perhaps you should consider writing about Penelopism on your own website. [www.netfirms.com] has some options that you might consider.

In any case, I hope that you continue to contribute to Wikipedia and will enjoy being a Wikipedia. Stifle (talk) 11:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Importance? Maybe not to you. But to those poor Penelopists who are sick of christians, etc. takin' up all the space! What about them? Do they not count?

Penelopism is a religion. Does it not deserve the same respect that other religions recieve? Do we not deserve a small paragraph explaining to all those antipens that Penelopism means no harm and that we are a peaceful people who wish merely to befriend them all? Even you. Even though you have used your bigoted, republican views to attempt to run out Penelopism, Penelope doesn't hate you. And there is a site. It's right here. http://www.freewebs.com/penelopism

And, ok, maybe not everyone can afford an official domain name. The Bragens are not rich, you know. I mean, they couldn't even afford the Penelopism hoodies. Only the T-shirts. Which they are, of course, just as happy about. But it's winter and cold and hoodies would have been so much better. But still. The point is made. T-shirts. T-shirts. Now, I hope you will stop being like this and embrace we Penelopists as we are. Penelopists. We may even grow to only mildly disdain you. Unless you are a Republican. Then we will hate you forever.

Penelopism is not a religion. It is a made up fairy tale cult that sprouted from the mind of an ignorant self-obsessed pre-adolescent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.241.135.52 (talk) 03:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

And I would do the squiggles, however, I do not know what that means and I cannot possible agree to do something unless I know fully what I am agreeing to do. Kudos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jejequeso (talk • contribs) 06:05, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm not going to attempt to reply to your message, because you don't appear to be open to my point. If you want to dispute the deletion further, you will need to take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review.

Typing ~~~~ at the end of your message simply produces your name and the date and time. I've done it at the end of this message. Stifle (talk) 10:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Ownership of articles

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Please don't edit other people's comments

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Stifle‎, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shenme (talk) 06:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Warning

This message relates to this edit. Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 16:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Stifle, you will be blocked from editing. Stifle (talk) 20:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Stifle, you will be blocked from editing. Stifle (talk) 09:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Harassment will not be tolerated

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for harassment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 16:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:Stifle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 12:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 12:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Stifle, you will be blocked from editing. This warning has no time limit. Any unwanted comment at the User:Stifle talkpage will incur another short block, and any obvious vandalism will result in a long or indefinite block of this account. I would also strongly suggest you limit your interaction with User:Stifle to the necessary minimum within Wikipedia. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

:(

I don't understand why you're picking on me! I didn't do anything wrong but you keep yelling at me and calling me names and Penelopism is not pointless it's awesome and you're making me cry because Penelopism is very important to me and my cousin, Jessica, and I are Penelopists and my cousin died in a car crash so now all I have left to remember her is Penelopism and how much she loved it and how loyal she was to Penelope so I wanted to make a page about it because I wanted the page to be somewhat a memorial to her and now I'm crying because you've crushed me inside...—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jejequeso (talk • contribs)

12:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. Please sign your messages in future by typing ~~~~ at the end.

I'm glad to hear that your made-up religion has managed to make it to three members for a while. Perhaps you should create a website at one of the many free web hosts on the Internet about it; Wikipedia is not a free host. Stifle (talk) 15:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

LMFAO good one who ever you are who posted it wikipedia isn't a free host oh i didnt know that i thought it was a breeding ground for stalkers who post peoples life storys —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.166.145.157 (talk) 06:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Final warning

This is your last warning. If you continue to add nonsense or offensive messages to user talk pages, as you did in this edit, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stifle (talk) 16:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

hey wiki pedia please delete this none sense ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.166.145.157 (talk) 06:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)