Jdabro

Welcome!

Hello, Jdabro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Jesse Gingold, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cassandra 73 (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jesse Gingold

A tag has been placed on Jesse Gingold requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cassandra 73 (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Crexpedio

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Crexpedio, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.crexpedio.com/voip.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 18:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Crexpedio

Hello Jdabro,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Crexpedio for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Ben Ben (talk) 18:51, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Additions of http://.crexpedio.com

Please stop. If you continue spamming Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.--Hu12 (talk) 16:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at List of telephone operating companies, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Biker Biker (talk) 18:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 07:28, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jdabro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't understand the constant banning of information that is verifiable. Aparently your editors are more interested in gaining points than they are in actually adding correct information to your pages. I am not blocked indefinetely for adding correct information to a categorized section. The category is there and sitting empty until you guys start allowing users to update it accordingly. I am going to spend my time on something more productive than to help the world find what they are looking for. You really need to stop pissing off your contributors

Decline reason:

No valid reason to unblock offered. For the record, we do not gain points for performing what is a very necessary function in this encyclopedia, and you are advised to read spam policy. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So as president of the company you keep spamming you think we should ignore your narcissistic contributions? You really think we shouldn't piss you off? No chance. Your actions make you fair game and you got nothing less than you deserved. --Biker Biker (talk) 16:20, 25 November 2012 (UTC)